From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 3884 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2020 20:29:03 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 14 Dec 2020 20:29:03 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id AD0009C818; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:28:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721859C78F; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:28:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6453A944D8; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:28:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from nsstlmta23p.bpe.bigpond.com (nsstlmta23p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.23]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A30944D8 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:28:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.24.4]) by nsstlfep23p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20201214202804.CVKE13959.nsstlfep23p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:28:04 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudekkedgudefkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfupfevtfgpvffgnffuvffttedpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecugedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesmhdttdertderjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeigeetiedvveefffdukefhgeeludevjeektdfgfedukefhkeelledvjeehteeffeenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqecuuefqffgjpeekuefkvffokffogfdprhgtphhtthhopeeothhuhhhssehtuhhhshdrohhrgheq X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (5.8.420) id 5F73BFB01AC8DD5F for tuhs@tuhs.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:28:04 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0BEKS3vq071976 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:28:03 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 0BEKS2pf071973 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:28:03 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:28:01 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society In-Reply-To: <88E7F8CE-DC08-44AB-BF12-EFD4C5958950@iitbombay.org> Message-ID: References: <88E7F8CE-DC08-44AB-BF12-EFD4C5958950@iitbombay.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1483753691-505852492-1607977683=:25789" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Were cron and at done at the same time? Or one before the other? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1483753691-505852492-1607977683=:25789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Bakul Shah wrote: > please don’t blame c++ on pascal folks. stroustrup had nothing to do > with pascal.   I certainly hope not; Pascal was meant to be a teaching language, not a production language. As for C++, well, what can I say? It should've been called C-- ... You wrote your algorithm in Pascal, debugged it, and then rewrote it in your favourite language (in my case, ALGOL-W). -- Dave --1483753691-505852492-1607977683=:25789--