On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Hellwig Geisse wrote:

>> That would evaluate to a constant being printed (it's a direct array  
>> reference).  Did you mean something like "...[i]" instead?  That would  
>> indeed be neat...
>
> I think it doesn't matter if the index expression is a constant 
> expression or not. The point here, as I understood, is the definition of 
> an unnamed (and not explicitly typed) array "on the fly".

Ah, I see; thanks.  Sometimes I'm too pedantic for my own good :-)

-- Dave