* [TUHS] RFC formatting
@ 2019-10-04 22:41 ron minnich
2019-10-08 13:21 ` Tony Finch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: ron minnich @ 2019-10-04 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: TUHS main list
"why is the formatting so weird" someone asked me.
I am guessing, looking at RFC 1, that it was formatted with an
ancestor of runoff but ... anyone?
ron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [TUHS] RFC formatting
2019-10-04 22:41 [TUHS] RFC formatting ron minnich
@ 2019-10-08 13:21 ` Tony Finch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tony Finch @ 2019-10-08 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ron minnich; +Cc: TUHS main list
ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> "why is the formatting so weird" someone asked me.
>
> I am guessing, looking at RFC 1, that it was formatted with an
> ancestor of runoff but ... anyone?
This is really a question for the Internet History list, I think
http://www.postel.org/internet-history/
I don't know how things were done in the 1970s, except that the NIC used
Englebart's NLS. I get the impression that the earliest RFCs were
formatted using the facilities at the author's home institution; I don't
know about the mechanics of duplication and distribution, but it relied on
paper mail for some years until the NIC spun up an FTP server, e.g.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc95
For a very long time, RFCs and drafts were produced using nroff. You can
see some of the remnants of that here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/pubprocess/tools/
For about 20 years there has been an XML source format for RFCs
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629
But in the final stages the RFC Editor would convert to nroff to produce
the final published form.
They have just this week switched to a toolchain based on v3 of the
xml2rfc source format. I believe they aren't using nroff for the text
format any more, the publishing tool produces it directly.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jemoHh4imSYkX_Oo2FvMyt_7ZYg
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
defend the right to speak, write, worship, associate, and vote freely
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-08 13:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-04 22:41 [TUHS] RFC formatting ron minnich
2019-10-08 13:21 ` Tony Finch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).