From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15954 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2021 22:12:11 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Feb 2021 22:12:11 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 906859C2E5; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:12:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661B99BA45; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:11:45 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id B22649BA45; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:11:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minun.buric.co (minun.buric.co [51.15.8.196]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8579BA40 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:11:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minun.buric.co (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B877935C0EF4; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 23:11:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minun.buric.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D03A35C0D6D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:11:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:11:40 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Nickolas X-X-Sender: mary@sd-119843.dedibox.fr To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <202102030759.1137x7C2013543@freefriends.org> <202102030858.1138wuqd011051@freefriends.org> <27567.1612399305@hop.toad.com> <20210204013356.GA16541@mcvoy.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [TUHS] 68k prototypes & microcode X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Fri, 5 Feb 2021, Dave Horsfall wrote: > The Z80 was quite nice; I wrote heaps of programs for it, and I even found an > ANSI C Compiler for it (Hi-Tech as I recall; BDS-C was, well, you could > barely call it "C")[*]. I compiled a number of Unix programs... Well, it *was* "Braindead Software" C. > The x86 architecture is utterly brain-dead; I mean, what's wrong with a > linear address space? I think it was JohnG who said "segment registers > are for worms". The 65816 doesn't have the screwed-up bitshifted segment stuff but it's also a segmented architecture and is also braindead. And I'm a 65C02 fan. -uso.