From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 6661 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2021 21:04:32 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Apr 2021 21:04:32 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9E66F9C5E0; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:04:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88119C20C; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:03:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6CF009C209; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:03:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minun.buric.co (minun.buric.co [51.15.8.196]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35E69C09E for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:03:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minun.buric.co (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A43B235C0EEF; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:03:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minun.buric.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FF735C0C9A; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:03:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Nickolas X-X-Sender: mary@sd-119843.dedibox.fr To: Clem Cole In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [TUHS] Can I use Apout simulator on Windows 10? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org" Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Clem Cole wrote: > As its author, WKT has more info than others but since he does not mention > it in his README and due to TZ issue (he's likely asleep right now), I'll > take a shot. Note: I can not say I have tried it, but I would expect it > to compile and run on WSL. I can say I ran in a few years ago on a Mac and > 'just worked.' You might need to tweak it a little bit if for no other > reason than RedHat Linux 2.2 is pretty old and was 32 bit, but WKT's code > is pretty clean and I would not expect any real issues. Since he is > assuming a 32-bit system, and I have not played with it in a while, my > guess is that the one place you might need to be careful. His comment in > the read says: > > It should compile on a 32-bit little-endian machine with > > some form of Unix; you may need to change some header file includes etc. > > See `defines.h' for the details. In particular, if your system doesn't have > > types for: > > > > int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, u_int8_t, u_int16_t, u_int32_t > > or if your compiler doesn't have char=1 byte, short= 2 bytes, int=4 bytes, > > then alter the relevant typedefs in `defines.h'. Didn't someone here port apout to win32, and it *almost* worked 100%? I remember reading about it on virtuallyfun.com, but I might be mistaken. On Win10 you could also just install Debian in WSL, and it might work better there? -uso.