From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4202 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2022 01:47:45 -0000
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jan 2022 01:47:45 -0000
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 887929D049; Sun,  2 Jan 2022 11:47:41 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905409CF06;
	Sun,  2 Jan 2022 11:47:18 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id 764C89CF06; Sun,  2 Jan 2022 11:47:17 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minun.buric.co (minun.buric.co [51.15.8.196])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235959CE58
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Sun,  2 Jan 2022 11:47:16 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minun.buric.co (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id A93DB35C10B7; Sun,  2 Jan 2022 02:47:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by minun.buric.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECD435C0F84
 for <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>; Sat,  1 Jan 2022 20:47:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2022 20:47:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co>
X-X-Sender: mary@sd-119843.dedibox.fr
To: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220102012033.GB7055@mcvoy.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2201012042390.9230@sd-119843.dedibox.fr>
References: <CAKH6PiX6bfsSw+N2zABfwuA8+cW_haiYh6bQzefMjnqTWJ8u8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKr6gn3bZ2Ac99gTknNRd8CVMAQB0+ArbtYCU9OOdOeLJvw-iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20211231234039.GU31637@mcvoy.com>
 <202201012000.201K0Fd31610896@darkstar.fourwinds.com>
 <20220102001244.GF10078@mcvoy.com>
 <CAD2gp_TsxYZgC3d+oGz8UgZvH3gEiwDmt3c4tUKS9CQNT3LSYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220102012033.GB7055@mcvoy.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [TUHS] roff(7) [ and other related stuff ]
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

On Sat, 1 Jan 2022, Larry McVoy wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 08:04:58PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
>
>> Why use C syntax?  What was wrong with Fortran, Lisp, or Cobol syntax,
>> extended to do what you wanted?
>
> I'm almost speechless.  My progression was Basic, Pascal, C (and later
> Fortran, Lisp, no Cobol, I did an Ada Compiler so Ada I guess).  Then
> on to awk, perl, tcl, I tried to like C++ but couldn't, tried to like
> Rust, Go, D, and couldn't.

Kinda sounds like me.  Classic Microsoft BASIC, then QBASIC which was a 
mutant freak dialect with structs, functions and stuff... started learning 
C++ and then moved to C.  I rarely use anything these days but C and once 
in a blue moon QBASIC for something quick and dirty.

> If you think any of those other languages remotely approach the elegance
> of C, I just don't know what to say.

This.

I think it blends terseness, cleanness, simplicity and ease of use in just 
the right quantities in a way no language before or since has really been 
able to muster.  Its only real weakness to me is that it isn't very good 
at string handling (the reason I sometimes kitbash stuff in BASIC still).

-uso.