The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co>
To: Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com>
Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Compilation "vs" byte-code interpretation, was Re: Looking back to 1981 - what pascal was popular on what unix?
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 17:45:58 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2201311743550.786@sd-119843.dedibox.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABH=_VS7G1XqO03NRkvSXEr8EiHWWP_sGyRnVNxV9wt3G9W_EQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, Paul Winalski wrote:

> On 1/30/22, Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> wrote:
>>
>> And I think I've heard the Infocom compilers' bytecode called "Z-code" (I
>> use this term too).
>>
> That is correct.  The Infocom games ran on an interpreter for an
> abstract machine called the Z-machine.  Z-code is the Z-machine's
> instruction set.  There is a freeware implementation out there called
> Frotz.
>
> -Paul W.
>
> "Plugh" (said in a hollow voice)
>

There's also InfoTaskForce and JZIP, both of which I *think* work on *x, 
but they are not as advanced as Frotz.  JZIP comes closer, having been 
Frotz's main competition for some time in the late 1990s.

-uso.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-31 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28 23:07 [TUHS] " Will Senn
2022-01-28 23:18 ` Dan Cross
2022-01-28 23:31   ` Will Senn
2022-01-29  0:03     ` Rob Pike
2022-01-29  0:40     ` Will Senn
2022-01-29 19:05       ` John Cowan
2022-01-29 19:36         ` arnold
2022-01-29 19:59 ` Clem Cole
2022-01-29 20:02   ` Jon Steinhart
2022-01-29 20:13   ` Bakul Shah
2022-01-29 20:30     ` Clem Cole
2022-01-29 20:34     ` Larry McVoy
2022-01-29 21:03       ` Al Kossow
2022-01-29 21:38         ` Larry McVoy
2022-01-29 22:06       ` Bakul Shah
2022-01-29 22:48         ` GREEN
2022-01-30  3:27           ` Larry McVoy
2022-01-30 16:57   ` David Barto
2022-01-30 18:07     ` [TUHS] Compilation "vs" byte-code interpretation, was " Dan Stromberg
2022-01-30 20:09       ` David Barto
2022-01-31  7:59         ` WEB
2022-01-30 22:51       ` Dan Cross
2022-01-30 23:57         ` Dan Stromberg
2022-01-31  0:23         ` Nemo Nusquam
2022-01-31  0:45           ` Steve Nickolas
2022-01-31 17:16             ` Paul Winalski
2022-01-31 20:00               ` Erik E. Fair
2022-01-31 22:45               ` Steve Nickolas [this message]
2022-02-02  4:53               ` Adam Thornton
2022-01-31  1:41       ` Phil Budne
2022-02-07  3:04   ` [TUHS] " Rob Gingell
     [not found] <A84C7761-A80D-4F8D-B541-2C7F7E5B5E39@hotmail.co.uk>
2022-01-30 20:09 ` [TUHS] Compilation "vs" byte-code interpretation, was " silas poulson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2201311743550.786@sd-119843.dedibox.fr \
    --to=usotsuki@buric.co \
    --cc=paul.winalski@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).