From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 1461 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2022 23:29:53 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Sep 2022 23:29:53 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E9B422D0; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:29:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minun.buric.co (minun.buric.co [51.15.8.196]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C98422CF for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:29:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minun.buric.co (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D19035C0FAC; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:30:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minun.buric.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEAF35C0F82 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:30:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:30:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Nickolas X-X-Sender: mary@sd-119843.dedibox.fr To: TUHS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20220908221639.GR11929@mcvoy.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-ID-Hash: 6UU2CEOCX5DA5XQPHF6TZJD5EU53R2OC X-Message-ID-Hash: 6UU2CEOCX5DA5XQPHF6TZJD5EU53R2OC X-MailFrom: usotsuki@buric.co X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Re-implementations/Clean-Rooms et al. List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, Warner Losh wrote: > But it likely didn't matter, since 32v likely lost its copyright > protection due to AT&T distributing too many copies without the required > copyright markings. At least that was the preliminary ruling that caused > the suit to be settled... AT&T didn't want it finalized, though the cat > was somewhat out of the bag at this point... It would be nice if that were an absolute rather than a probably, because then the status for 32V wouldn't be clouded. -uso.