From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32345 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2023 20:09:16 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 19 Jan 2023 20:09:16 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68A5424AB; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 06:09:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minun.buric.co (minun.buric.co [51.15.8.196]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAC2424AA for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 06:09:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minun.buric.co (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7658435C0C49; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:08:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minun.buric.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D63835C0C3D for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:08:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:08:52 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Nickolas X-X-Sender: mary@sd-119843.dedibox.fr To: tuhs@tuhs.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-ID-Hash: HOIYJJSJYY5EAKIS23A5QXF7WSCEJCOU X-Message-ID-Hash: HOIYJJSJYY5EAKIS23A5QXF7WSCEJCOU X-MailFrom: usotsuki@buric.co X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: AIX moved into maintainance mode (fwd) List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Accidentally sent this only to the person I was replying to. > I am getting some grief on Twitter too for "omitting" FreeBSD. I > didn't, but the BSDs don't fit either definition of "Unix". The > pre-1993 one being "based on AT&T code" -- after all, BSD (4.4 Lite r2 > was it? Before my time!) -- went to a lot of effort to eliminate AT&T > code. >From what I've seen it's very much a gradual transition; 4.3-Tahoe starts to have the new code and UCB copyright notices with the predecessor of what we call the "BSD License" appearing in some of the source files. Then with Reno, a majority of the userland is open-sourced, and Net/2 is fairly complete. (Net/2 and 4.4BSD-Lite / Lite/2 were lacking a few things.) But even right up until the end things were in a state of flux. A few things weren't finished until much later by the FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD people. -uso.