From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: b4@gewt.net (Cory Smelosky)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:02:06 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] 2.10
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.03.1411202234310.646@gewt.net>
References: <CAHYQbfAZXpeeHQCe=Qv7YqieGDUa6LmtAkQ_6i2S21R=9ki4+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+oaVqwGKiOPKm8Bz62Z0s9dEYiAbTXR9=WrQyjqGFX-uaYmjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHYQbfDGnf1tfSpZJx1K80x4MRfPH4_aHs8fq=vxkekeTc8Hqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.GSO.2.03.1411202234310.646@gewt.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.03.1411202256300.646@gewt.net>

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
>
>> Jim / Nick,  That's kinda my problem: can't find enough documentation on
>> 2.10 to ascertain if I can / should run it. I know 2.9 is OK for the 11/34,
>> but 2.9 doesn't have telnet or ftp and I want this machine to be easily
>> reachable on the net.
>> 
>
> Was it branched from the CSRG tree or was it implemented third-party?  I can 
> search my copy of the SCCS tree and see what it would've included if the 
> former is the case.
>

Oh, nevermind.  Looks like I have an archive containing 2.10 source and 
(maybe) some binaries.

# Machine type
# 2.10 runs on:
#	11/24/34/44/53/60/70/73/83/84
#	11/23/35/40/45/50/55 with 18 or 22 bit addressing
# 2.10 WILL NOT run on:
#	T11, 11/03/04/05/10/15/20/21
#	11/23/35/40/45/50/55 with 16 bit addressing
# 2.10 networking will run on:
#	11/44/53/70/73/83/84
#	11/45/50/55 with 18 bit addressing

#ifndef lint
static char sccsid[] = "@(#)telnetd.c   5.19 (Berkeley) 7/27/87";
#endif not lint


-- 
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects