From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20913 invoked from network); 4 May 2023 18:50:17 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (2600:3c01:e000:146::1) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 May 2023 18:50:17 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2747424D9; Fri, 5 May 2023 04:50:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from nb3.reedmedia.net (nb3.xen.prgmr.com [IPv6:2605:2700:0:2:a800:ff:fe31:7f4a]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF7C424D8; Fri, 5 May 2023 04:50:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from [47.185.76.195] (helo=reedmedia.net) by nb3.reedmedia.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1pue1f-0007Nq-82; Thu, 04 May 2023 18:49:59 +0000 Received: from reed@reedmedia.net by reedmedia.net with local (mailout 0.17) id 9490-1683226199; Thu, 04 May 2023 18:50:00 +0000 Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 18:49:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" To: tuhs@tuhs.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID-Hash: WF3HC6YUVIOWRWUBVFICN6FBLTQ63SNT X-Message-ID-Hash: WF3HC6YUVIOWRWUBVFICN6FBLTQ63SNT X-MailFrom: reed@reedmedia.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Warren Toomey X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: OT: TUHS mails not going to Outlook & Hotmail. Help! List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 3 May 2023, Brad Spencer wrote: > Other stranger stuff.. from my logs of incoming TUHS email it looks > like you can send via IPv4 and IPv6... is it only one of those sending > addresses that fail?? (This may be hard to determine, I realize, but it Maybe the TXT SPF needs to add ip6:2600:3c01:e000:146::1