From: toby@telegraphics.com.au (Toby Thain)
Subject: [TUHS] 80 columns ...
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:46:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b86a8319-998e-17c3-75c8-d8b50f76ab9e@telegraphics.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201711102043.vAAKhaYB020128@darkstar.fourwinds.com>
On 2017-11-10 3:43 PM, Jon Steinhart wrote:
> Toby Thain writes:
>> Just don't move on without some limit. There are real
>> cognitive/typographic reasons why excessively long lines hurt
>> comprehension. This is why both 500 year old books and 5 month old books
>> have narrow measures.
>>
>> 80 might be too narrow for most, but at some point beyond 132 is "too
>> far". :)
>
> Well, I would claim that books have technological limitations that are
> different than computer monitors. It's a matter of doing what's appropriate
> instead of taking a dogmatic approach.
It's _reading_. Code doesn't magically escape typographic factors. The
human visual/processing system is the constraint, it does not care
whether you're reading paper or the more hostile LCD - and it has not
changed materially in the millennia we've been doing writing (and
certainly not the 500 years we've been doing books). There is also a
body of modern research on this. Even research specifically focused on
code, I believe.
>
> I will point out that while it's sometimes a pain, the reader/writer ratio
> is a major driving force. I save on typing and use very terse code when
> writing stuff for myself. But, when writing stuff where there are many
> readers I feel that it's my job to put in the extra work to make it more
> accessible to the reader, partly because I don't want the readers bugging me.
>
> Jon
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 20:52 ron minnich
2017-11-08 21:02 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-08 21:19 ` Dan Cross
2017-11-08 21:24 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-08 21:28 ` Steve Nickolas
2017-11-08 21:48 ` [TUHS] (cassette) tape coming back [was " Charles H Sauer
2017-11-08 22:46 ` Don Hopkins
2017-11-08 23:28 ` [TUHS] " Dave Horsfall
2017-11-08 23:35 ` Ron Natalie
2017-11-08 23:39 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-11-08 21:34 ` Dan Cross
2017-11-08 21:40 ` Dan Cross
2017-11-08 21:40 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-08 21:43 ` Dan Cross
2017-11-09 1:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-08 23:46 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2017-11-09 6:52 ` Otto Moerbeek
2017-11-08 21:06 ` Bakul Shah
2017-11-08 21:18 ` Steve Nickolas
2017-11-08 22:17 ` Grant Taylor
2017-11-08 22:30 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-11-08 23:07 ` Andy Kosela
2017-11-08 23:15 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-11-08 23:15 ` Warner Losh
2017-11-08 23:49 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-11-09 0:04 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-11-08 23:24 ` Andy Kosela
2017-11-09 7:24 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2017-11-09 15:02 ` Don Hopkins
2017-11-09 19:14 ` Ron Natalie
2017-11-10 16:18 ` Nemo
2017-11-10 19:05 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 20:36 ` Toby Thain
2017-11-10 20:39 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-10 20:46 ` Warner Losh
2017-11-10 20:59 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-11 9:24 ` David Arnold
2017-11-10 20:43 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 20:58 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-10 21:02 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 21:09 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-10 21:12 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 21:34 ` William Corcoran
2017-11-10 21:50 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 22:58 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-11-10 23:05 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 23:52 ` Toby Thain
2017-11-11 0:24 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-11 16:40 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-11-11 16:47 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-11 17:23 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-11 17:38 ` Ralph Corderoy
2017-11-10 22:46 ` Toby Thain [this message]
2017-11-10 22:59 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-11 14:33 ` Andy Kosela
2017-11-11 17:19 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-11 17:24 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-11 17:25 ` Jon Steinhart
2017-11-10 23:59 ` Don Hopkins
2017-11-10 22:10 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-11-09 20:46 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2017-11-10 17:21 Norman Wilson
2017-11-10 17:56 ` Larry McVoy
2017-11-11 17:04 ` Ian Zimmerman
2017-11-11 17:30 ` Random832
2017-11-11 18:05 ` Ian Zimmerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b86a8319-998e-17c3-75c8-d8b50f76ab9e@telegraphics.com.au \
--to=toby@telegraphics.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).