From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19086 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2020 18:51:42 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Dec 2020 18:51:42 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BDBCF94543; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:51:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7363944D4; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:51:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=mhorton-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@mhorton-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="jnLf6Q6j"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8D9DF944D4; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:51:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com (mail-pg1-f169.google.com [209.85.215.169]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4320A944D3 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:51:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id g18so13014861pgk.1 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mhorton-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=nchZqHOKK/GXJbc0MIHEQ5Ws1cGNXcdWFrCMh+yjvn0=; b=jnLf6Q6jGycpNhTyyk6q/JZY4wySY/QJ0Frprjc47JWjkVSjHx67nizB3Hx7jlz361 /++JemnkEeHVXJYIKDgqIGWItn771p1OWK/B3EBUESNbYqcznAoCIJVWjRyqHy97LtHc CDek3Y7EtEYq744S0fvSnlldd3hluViVGYnqvyKpMJHgcSMHpN1oVilX6ziSspa2jERo vGXlqClph1vZrK+Dx4WlXoUlmjLectFlbYLo4ITZRRnA07gglooKo9BEs1nsmbbCk1R/ 203zwqgtp4a5yhMaZ5K242l9sCV/ydCrWK4xgDCVFCxHNHfAE8WjQfE27hwZqLQn92dz 89xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=nchZqHOKK/GXJbc0MIHEQ5Ws1cGNXcdWFrCMh+yjvn0=; b=elXE9buPdI3YUyxESjWmGXnbQIT+/lGrqhW14E1EvLafb07sbLzLJwFbmrYM1aSAfo z4hOjjgNUUOJC/ShCLVCPDSB28Tuw0X2h9tEhw7uIt7bGtdhHJun9OdzK5AUoXBalY5/ 5npyG57+RRVuQxd43lt0ovSWMw8y5bFD6+/G5woLJWtE2NENh0xoSCk98kqy7g1Ddjn0 DgEpqbpyLpMT5Cj4MFaP5I086KaHYl8m7vUFhS/jtJPpD3N5J/FbiF52rL+Oky4cZi7R JuMvHXaPL27dW8VSqkgoD21omwySGUkval48BXDu9QEuFhFGZTcKz2INTvUoTscM9ICc 7zSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ApPTNrg6lsvTX5/mNxLmMUgF4a1etQTFBtakjiGJFXbnlRK5Z R0DSd9YHC5RRe4Ku0PcIZwp668yorq9v0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6aRyjD+qQvqlIyxZZlSIgDnYe3MhDFBiJX1Qq/IwsucAnr+oDTK5i1YttiW/KlbusYViftw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:368e:: with SMTP id d136mr23673170pga.239.1607453467336; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (ip72-197-247-231.sd.sd.cox.net. [72.197.247.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b19sm9168188pfo.24.2020.12.08.10.51.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:51:06 -0800 (PST) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: From: Mary Ann Horton Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:51:05 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [TUHS] Were cron and at done at the same time? Or one before the other? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" My V6 manual has cron(VIII) - documentation of /usr/lib/crontab - but no mention of at. This is consistent with my recollection - I first saw at in V7.     Mary Ann On 12/8/20 10:11 AM, ron minnich wrote: > When I got into Unix in 1976 cron and at were both there. > > I got to wondering for no particular reason which came first -- I had > always assumed cron, but ...? > > Anyone know?