From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 3191 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2021 01:57:37 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Feb 2021 01:57:37 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id EFB799C9E9; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:57:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB0E9C884; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:57:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 50F739C884; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:57:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579239C0A7 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:57:17 +1000 (AEST) X-Originating-IP: 143.244.48.21 Received: from Mac-Pro.local (unknown [143.244.48.21]) (Authenticated sender: aek@bitsavers.org) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4C811C0003 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:57:14 +0000 (UTC) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <202102030759.1137x7C2013543@freefriends.org> <202102030858.1138wuqd011051@freefriends.org> <27567.1612399305@hop.toad.com> <20210204013356.GA16541@mcvoy.com> From: Al Kossow Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:57:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [TUHS] 68k prototypes & microcode X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 2/3/21 5:47 PM, Al Kossow wrote: > On 2/3/21 5:33 PM, Larry McVoy wrote: >> Anyone have an opinion on where ARM lies in the pleasant >> to unpleasant scale? > > Don't look at how they implemented bit manipulation > https://spin.atomicobject.com/2013/02/08/bit-banding/