From: Jacob Moody <moody@posixcafe.org>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: forgotten versions
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:56:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d75ba4d8-b0cd-a531-4c31-556232a81510@posixcafe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEoi9W7QQEQyhBFv-uf2v2AMBX3cL4tjcqAvvY+pK8gHSz+qqA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/19/22 12:38, Dan Cross wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 2:33 PM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 10:47:23AM -0400, Kenneth Goodwin wrote:
>>> Just chiming in a bit..
>>>
>>> Rob, it might be interesting to old geezers like me as well as newbies
>>> entering the field to get a perspective on Plan 9 and its evolution. The
>>> motivations behind it. What your group was trying to accomplish, the
>>> approach, pitfalls and the entire decision making process as things went
>>> along. Even things that went horribly wrong and what happened etc.
>>
>> I'll second that. I think it would be really helpful.
>>
>> There was a time when I was reviewing a paper which made a bunch of
>> claims about what Plan 9 was trying to accomplish and in particular
>> about what the ultimate design goals for a particular component of
>> Plan 9. (I won't go into further details since as far as I know, that
>> paper was never published.)
>>
>> In any case, since I wasn't familiar with the history of Plan 9 to
>> evaluate these claims, with the permission of the PC chairs, I found
>> someone who had been part of the Plan 9 team, and asked them to review
>> certain passages for accuracy, and they said, "Uh, no.... that's
>> totally not the case. They're completely wrong."
>>
>> So if someone were willing to create additional write ups about
>> lessons learned, or if that's too much work, maybe someone could do
>> some interview for a podcast or a vlog, that would be really
>> excellent.
>
> Agreed. A retrospective would be a very welcome addition to the canon.
>
> - Dan C.
>
> (PS: I _had_ heard of the VAX effort before, but I don't think I'd known
> quite how nascent it was before it was abandoned in favor of MIPS and
> 68k.)
Adding my vote in for getting some sort of retrospective.
I recently stumbled across the existence of datakit
when going through the plan9foundation source archives.
Would be curious to hear more about its involvement
with plan9.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 23:06 [TUHS] " Rob Pike
2022-06-16 23:17 ` [TUHS] " Earl Baugh
2022-06-16 23:18 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-16 23:44 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-17 0:10 ` Larry McVoy
2022-06-17 16:23 ` [TUHS] Sockets vs Streams (was " Bakul Shah
2022-06-17 17:43 ` [TUHS] " Paul Winalski
2022-06-17 22:52 ` Dan Stromberg
2022-06-17 7:20 ` [TUHS] " Diomidis Spinellis
2022-06-17 7:33 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-17 8:34 ` arnold
2022-06-17 10:52 ` arnold
2022-06-18 7:05 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 7:50 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-19 8:17 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 8:53 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-19 9:02 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 9:14 ` arnold
2022-06-19 9:19 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 9:23 ` arnold
2022-06-19 11:37 ` Matthias Bruestle
2022-06-19 14:47 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2022-06-19 16:27 ` Al Kossow
2022-06-19 18:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-06-19 18:38 ` Dan Cross
2022-06-21 23:56 ` Jacob Moody [this message]
2022-06-22 0:13 ` Larry McVoy
2022-06-22 0:48 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-22 1:55 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-22 2:10 ` Bakul Shah
2022-06-22 2:14 ` Jon Steinhart
2022-06-22 2:19 ` Andrew Hume
2022-06-22 2:58 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-22 3:09 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-22 2:16 ` Andrew Hume
2022-06-22 2:55 ` Brad Spencer
2022-06-17 14:50 Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-18 0:35 Douglas McIlroy
2022-06-18 5:00 ` Kevin Bowling
2022-06-18 5:13 ` Adam Thornton
2022-06-18 16:58 ` Clem Cole
2022-06-18 17:18 ` Warner Losh
2022-06-18 17:57 ` Clem Cole
2022-06-18 19:55 Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-22 12:06 Noel Chiappa
2022-06-23 0:02 ` Dan Cross
2022-06-23 2:18 Noel Chiappa
2022-06-24 6:47 Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-25 19:16 ` Anthony Martin
2022-06-25 20:45 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-27 0:57 ` Kevin Bowling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d75ba4d8-b0cd-a531-4c31-556232a81510@posixcafe.org \
--to=moody@posixcafe.org \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).