From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7791 invoked from network); 26 May 2021 02:54:32 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 May 2021 02:54:32 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 18A209B9E1; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:54:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BA49B6B4; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:53:32 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com header.b="rbbirsfA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 47F869B6B4; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:53:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1310044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.131.44]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9954C9B654 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:53:28 +1000 (AEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LA/ds3uoWUsVehEqHKFYua27t/ivgrf7jlkKNXMps8PBlUHmYk+UDC+9Vt+dWrAJZChNa1cNrRHqmXjWr2QVSq/hVZG2KL103dKTZmJABiZyK4Z8W4PdJt6RSslxEgb6zrpX2oSBJLn5BNtK1PLAT8cCnhq9Dx33fWnHcZS1OgkfofqCbVE8L5E0yao15CyKxDyL1Uy9ATP0rvwxhgjRrssORPc/YmhzuO2553HJDgqjobxZRIwJPWpNang9t2/qOSH4yIzWkP4lj/J+JtKqrdqDXwyZCkWfA1Nis1vUHgaTf73y1uymW6/Qu0TdpJxxYhwPLCFUC1J+ZTGL69rwBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=e77Zgq6FGQAGdU9WukgpBNn2ju08+IcJQowudEzljVU=; b=OVurDXIbeHCB3e54JjWx/k5XDt/4/T81mqJ+cWoGSBysVPT+tMGIwBhd5ooZ4/qM0o4AJdeY2UeM/wL51jxtlNK09HMLA9qv/RiyF21QVbM8NaIACIwDuHf55jt8pQ8byj6RPeeSTtCb9I80BzL7tSzzZXl1GWTidx6ATgorGxC+z8qseClZ87/tVGypoywTLMBrBJjS53q15vC9G7+nno7HnkUMPPQ+1WS1YpQwESuGexbhxeVz11caK9G0aTkk7MMD7MbAbXMWXaO0nbyhuoVA49DzxzyFic2asurd0GVTDQ742kNpqjzDDdVMbnmzp25lX1Ls4+/uTh8zy80FoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=fail (sender ip is 172.86.181.34) smtp.rcpttodomain=gmail.com smtp.mailfrom=superglobalmegacorp.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=superglobalmegacorp.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-outdoorexpressionslimited-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=e77Zgq6FGQAGdU9WukgpBNn2ju08+IcJQowudEzljVU=; b=rbbirsfAD7RciWUuWTGW2yrtjGsnUOmAuLVVO9ZRVN4hJ/8KXlPyHtbbbXi8bptZtBbbn73ZvnRMxoChfPZQ42i8XMak+9FJI2cRXJxzCNyH4MQutjjd9rqAzJhpTtdixkro9l/kXxkE+/AeCbnUM7nrIT73GWYaIPKvrBS8kvI= Received: from SL2P216CA0006.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:100:18::16) by HK0PR02MB2388.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:20::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4150.25; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:53:24 +0000 Received: from PU1APC01FT020.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:1096:100:18:cafe::f4) by SL2P216CA0006.outlook.office365.com (2603:1096:100:18::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4150.27 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:53:24 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 172.86.181.34) smtp.mailfrom=superglobalmegacorp.com; gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=superglobalmegacorp.com; Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of superglobalmegacorp.com does not designate 172.86.181.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=172.86.181.34; helo=exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local; Received: from exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local (172.86.181.34) by PU1APC01FT020.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.4129.25 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:53:23 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:192.168.6.10] (localgate [10.1.0.1]) by exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id K7TGZWH2; Wed, 26 May 2021 11:15:58 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregg Levine From: Jason Stevens Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:53:21 +0800 Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: References: <4fabd785-3763-d100-b97d-0a0a7377b833@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <82114c60-2abd-4688-8bc1-444e32db257f@PU1APC01FT031.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_A35ED586-DCF3-4559-ACB4-3DC0B5A9DBEA_" Message-ID: X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 756cb1d0-031e-4393-5d85-08d91ff16dc7 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HK0PR02MB2388: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:172.86.181.34; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local; PTR:joe28.superglobalmegacorp.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(136003)(39830400003)(396003)(376002)(46966006)(36840700001)(70586007)(47076005)(5660300002)(356005)(70206006)(33964004)(186003)(82310400003)(53546011)(31696002)(86362001)(2906002)(478600001)(26005)(316002)(36906005)(6666004)(4326008)(8936002)(31686004)(336012)(6916009)(8676002)(36860700001)(9686003)(54906003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: superglobalmegacorp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2021 02:53:23.0101 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 756cb1d0-031e-4393-5d85-08d91ff16dc7 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 870ed452-0577-4b7b-90ed-9cac080031b9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=870ed452-0577-4b7b-90ed-9cac080031b9; Ip=[172.86.181.34]; Helo=[exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PU1APC01FT020.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK0PR02MB2388 Subject: Re: [TUHS] H.J. Lu Bootable Root & Base System disks X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org" Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --_A35ED586-DCF3-4559-ACB4-3DC0B5A9DBEA_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Super thanks I=E2=80=99ll take a look! I guess I should also say the attempt at bringing Mach to the Amiga saved a= few bits of Mach when they were doing the Net/2 sub system, but then the l= awsuit happened and as we all know academia and the world moved away from t= he microkernel thing (well except for Utah). But I guess now with the news= of SeL4=E2=80=99s demise it=E2=80=99s basically all Linux and NT these day= s.=20 From: Gregg Levine Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2021 9:57 am To: Jason Stevens Cc: Sean Dwyer; tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Subject: Re: [TUHS] H.J. Lu Bootable Root & Base System disks Hello! If it helps atll the strange people at Ibib managed to rescue the collection that was running on the Linux distro side of the house, and it's stored in their historic-linux directory.. Oh and the very early Slackware stuff is available on the mirror of Slackware's FTP site on the Mirror Services site at ftp.mirrorservice.org. Incidentally a very early mirror of the TSX site is also inside that historic-linux directory. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:13 PM Jason Stevens wrote: > > Luckily in the rush to 0.99 the CD-ROM shovelware thing was in full swing= so lots of stuff got archived. > > > > It=E2=80=99s the older stuff that was always purged like COFF patches, or= OMF patches for older stuff, or even missing stuff from the big projects l= ike Emacs or GCC, and huge missing gaps in other GNU projects of all things= . > > > > GCC 0.90-1.21 everything in between these two is missing. Is it so bad? = Well it=E2=80=99s the start of adding 3rd parties code and G++ stuff as wel= l. Also lots of gaps in libraries. > > Things like the core utils, and other user-land stuff is missing and what= little I have was snapshotted on DECUS archives. > > > > Much like how binutils and Linux has/is removing a.out the old legacy stu= ff is being swept out. Much as everyone else seems to try to kill 32bit st= uff which makes running ancient GCC on modern platforms a bit more challeng= ing as I=E2=80=99ll have to do it under emulation. If I had the time/knowl= edge a 64bit hosted copy of GCC 1.42 would be cool but I think I may be the= only one interested in compiling old Linux/BSD stuff with the original too= ls on newer (and alien) platforms. > > > > From: Sean Dwyer via TUHS > Sent: Friday, 21 May 2021 6:17 pm > To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org > Subject: Re: [TUHS] H.J. Lu Bootable Root & Base System disks > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:33:46AM +0800, Jason Stevens wrote: > > > Is it okay for me to ask a question about Linux that's from '91~'92? > > > Does anyone happen to have copies of H.J. Lu's Bootable Root and the > > > associated Linux Base System disk images from the early '90s? > > > I've managed to find a copy of 0.98.pl5-31 bootable root disk. But I > > > can't find any base disks to go along with it. > > > The files used to be on tsx-11.mit.edu:/pub/linux/GCC in rootdisk and > > > basedisk subdirectories. > > > Unfortunately all of the mirrors I'm finding of tsx-11 are newer, have > > > the basedisk directories, but no image files there in. > > > -- > > > Grant. . . . > > > unix || die > > > > I do have the boot/roots for kernel 0.99 pl 7 from my Yggdrasil disks of > > July/August 1995 which I believe are also on archive.org. I used to have = disks > > from 1994 but they've been lost in time and I only have stuff from 94-97 = now, > > some of which are on archive.org already. Hope that helps. > -- > > I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise as they fly by. --_A35ED586-DCF3-4559-ACB4-3DC0B5A9DBEA_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

Super= thanks I=E2=80=99ll take a look!

 =

I guess I should also say the attempt at bringing = Mach to the Amiga saved a few bits of Mach when they were doing the Net/2 s= ub system, but then the lawsuit happened and as we all know academia and th= e world moved away from the microkernel thing (well except for Utah).=C2=A0= But I guess now with the news of SeL4=E2=80=99s demise it=E2=80=99s basica= lly all Linux and NT these days.

 =

 

&nb= sp;

From: Gregg Levine
Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2021 9:57 amTo: Jason Steven= s
Cc: Sean Dwyer; tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject:= Re: [TUHS] H.J. Lu Bootable Root & Base System disks

 

Hello!

If it helps atll=C2=A0 the strange people at Ibib managed to= rescue the

collection that was running on the Linu= x distro side of the house, and

it's stored in thei= r historic-linux directory.. Oh and the very early

= Slackware stuff is available on the mirror of Slackware's FTP site on

the Mirror Services site at ftp.mirrorservice.org. Incid= entally a very

early mirror of the TSX site is also= inside that historic-linux

directory.

-----

Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmai= l.com

"This signature fought the Time Wars, ti= me and again."

 

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:13 PM Jason Stevens

<jsteve@superglobalmegacorp.com> wrote:

> 

> Luckily in the rush t= o 0.99 the CD-ROM shovelware thing was in full swing so lots of stuff got a= rchived.

> 

> 

> 

=

> It=E2=80=99s the older stuff that was always purg= ed like COFF patches, or OMF patches for older stuff, or even missing stuff= from the big projects like Emacs or GCC, and huge missing gaps in other GN= U projects of all things.

> 

=

> 

> 

> GCC 0.90-1.21 everything in betw= een these two is missing.=C2=A0 Is it so bad? Well it=E2=80=99s the start o= f adding 3rd parties code and G++ stuff as well.=C2=A0 Also lots of gaps in= libraries.

> 

> Things like the core utils, and other user-land stuff is missin= g and what little I have was snapshotted on DECUS archives.

> 

> 

> 

>= ; Much like how binutils and Linux has/is removing a.out the old legacy stu= ff is being swept out.=C2=A0 Much as everyone else seems to try to kill 32b= it stuff which makes running ancient GCC on modern platforms a bit more cha= llenging as I=E2=80=99ll have to do it under emulation.=C2=A0 If I had the = time/knowledge a 64bit hosted copy of GCC 1.42 would be cool but I think I = may be the only one interested in compiling old Linux/BSD stuff with the or= iginal tools on newer (and alien) platforms.

> 

> 

> 

> From: Sean = Dwyer via TUHS

> Sent: Friday, 21 May 2021 6:17 = pm

> To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org

> Subject: Re: [TUHS] H.J. Lu Bootable Root & Base System disk= s

> 

>= ; On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:33:46AM +0800, Jason Stevens wrote:

> 

> > Is it= okay for me to ask a question about Linux that's from '91~'92?

> 

> > Does a= nyone happen to have copies of H.J. Lu's Bootable Root and the

> 

> > associ= ated Linux Base System disk images from the early '90s?

> 

> > I've managed t= o find a copy of 0.98.pl5-31 bootable root disk.=C2=A0 But I

> 

> > can't fin= d any base disks to go along with it.

>&nbs= p;

> > The files used to be on tsx-11.m= it.edu:/pub/linux/GCC in rootdisk and

>&nbs= p;

> > basedisk subdirectories.

> 

> > Un= fortunately all of the mirrors I'm finding of tsx-11 are newer, have

> 

> > t= he basedisk directories, but no image files there in.

> 

> > --

> 

> > Grant.= . . .

> 

> > unix || die

> 

> 

>&= nbsp;

> I do have the boot/roots for kerne= l 0.99 pl 7 from my Yggdrasil disks of

>&nb= sp;

> July/August 1995 which I believe are= also on archive.org. I used to have disks

> 

> from 1994 but they've been lost = in time and I only have stuff from 94-97 now,

><= o:p> 

> some of which are on archive.= org already. Hope that helps.

> --

> 

> I love dead= lines. I love the whooshing noise as they fly by.

<= o:p> 

= --_A35ED586-DCF3-4559-ACB4-3DC0B5A9DBEA_--