From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:146::1]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7D2529C for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB88A431B7; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:04:31 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuhs.org; s=dkim; t=1720044272; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-help: list-owner:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Y2Xa6rB9U8alO8EQEerZ80LlCObAK29gR5ThOABpzHQ=; b=CvgAvV2HLPLogxeCKpRhWginfCiFN2cD0DnBM+cCncO6iZ5PkFHY5b/OMZR5Jt5uQ3fegQ 7M36fIkB/qXIc+m3UDfsYspOZsRPX8iBVMeIDV31dvT+tcO3kxZNrUgMYbrgtej24CpRqc OiVXyWZ317T2SCbUWsf03HsmrLWtWGg= Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch (mail-40132.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.132]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0AF431A7 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:04:23 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1720044261; x=1720303461; bh=Y2Xa6rB9U8alO8EQEerZ80LlCObAK29gR5ThOABpzHQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=Af9XPzujWcvEpDF1bIzLw+xoN33J0RSqOrX/UBn49CNMO+JPny03RCQxZGROdXQK3 o+dcYG3+qRoSLWrNjYOF61Wyj2cWtCKP3gE0tkKdZ62YWC+G5xZJmQyUlcsZgMWPJJ 4PszXk7TUjj516IThEa9JPHVHD7XbJzAEjqa+X1smaYVrHLRKGKDyaj6Vy4cnoCUko A9b7fZp/N/d7Bp26V+2XkOkVTXceECEsb0uddr6ShQzi3i+MH89NckxQV8HE51YhvC h2Z/oAAlEh827gwcFOR29wcXt42I42TJzfkAn4tvPEFu2okDPsHR/fEFd8VIiT0nLp X1uqwHC+LUtoQ== Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 22:03:56 +0000 To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 35591162:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: f9f7c653a5a11b26f95bf4fce798062d330bb0a8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: 6FUCKJF5N3RIIUEO2QYJ5XPQBWVVHFVI X-Message-ID-Hash: 6FUCKJF5N3RIIUEO2QYJ5XPQBWVVHFVI X-MailFrom: segaloco@protonmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Is There Teletype DNA In the Blit? List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: segaloco via TUHS Reply-To: segaloco I suppose this question is best directed at Rob or Doug, but just might as = well ask at large: Given AT&T's ownership of Teletype and the involvement (= AFAIK) of Teletype with other WECo CRT terminals (e.g. Dataspeed 40 models)= , was there any direct involvement of folks from the Teletype side of thing= s in the R&D on the Jerq/Blit/DMD? Or was this terminal pure Bell Labs? - Matt G.