From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A3325AA2
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:36:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F87A4334E;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:36:47 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from vmail1.sentex.ca (vmail1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.19])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4B243335
	for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:36:40 +1000 (AEST)
Received: (Haraka outbound); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:36:40 -0400
Authentication-Results: vmail1.sentex.ca; auth=pass (plain)
Received: from [10.0.1.25] ([206.210.117.153])
	by vmail1.sentex.ca (Haraka/2.8.25) with ESMTPSA id CA52287D-E98A-4347-9D5F-D87EC3787993.1
	envelope-from <stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca> (authenticated bits=0)
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256);
	Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:36:40 -0400
Message-ID: <e88f6be8-7bcd-83c8-90fa-f2e88307286f@riddermarkfarm.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:36:39 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
References: <bnoWHCLhC1EI39d5WrbjMSstsPP8_LbT4PnbtB58WoRgmTc2mVQ8UaEkCtdJrTBLfkuYKHoj3Vl2HFRl7jz24P5V6qq2Ho5KEwFt1j-cQBE=@protonmail.com>
 <CAOkr1zUqW0bAP+9nWyFH4Ga6o=2cczPU=NNeCjuEjALfWWj0zg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-CA
From: Stuff Received <stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAOkr1zUqW0bAP+9nWyFH4Ga6o=2cczPU=NNeCjuEjALfWWj0zg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Haraka-GeoIP: NA, CA, ON, Campbellville, 23km
Message-ID-Hash: RGGO2W3GODWMFEKMYTBIJAGOTXIZQCBN
X-Message-ID-Hash: RGGO2W3GODWMFEKMYTBIJAGOTXIZQCBN
X-MailFrom: stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1
Precedence: list
Subject: [TUHS] Re: ANSI (C) vs IEEE (POSIX) Standards Body Selection
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.tuhs.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/message/RGGO2W3GODWMFEKMYTBIJAGOTXIZQCBN/>
List-Archive: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tuhs-owner@tuhs.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@tuhs.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tuhs-join@tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tuhs-leave@tuhs.org>

On 2024-06-26 14:35, Marc Rochkind wrote (in part):
> I think historically ANSI did languages.

Once upon a time, ANSI even had conformance testing (though that is not 
really relevant to this thread #6-).

S.