From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 19be2521 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 23:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4F782A1854; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:30:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8276A181B; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:30:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=tnetconsulting.net header.i=@tnetconsulting.net header.b=7O6PXtr8; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6743CA181B; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:30:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [45.33.28.24]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588BD9EE0C for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:30:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from REDACTED (drscriptt-2-pt.tunnel.tserv1.den1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:39:62a:0:0:0:2]) (authenticated bits=0) by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w5NNU5HK028516 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 18:30:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2015; t=1529796607; bh=SE202aSM3IXWZcRweQmLBKsibTWe18Ki5lPYuPMeNx8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Content-Disposition:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:MIME-Version:References:Reply-To:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Sender:Subject:To:User-Agent; b=7O6PXtr8EsFIwuZzh7HSP6humqg2HBqKMuIroHP5iL4p51ceN0+jqlvtkG7ocJ/Af rYndUWt5KNJaAsIWcz+b/czGC7Exs084DH3wdNYH6FuqMZ3Ul08wFy1agDGXFeN8mQ b04R1S3N+jeFCIroa4PYX/YV/LXVJkUMlrfp0628= To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <20180621234706.GA23316@minnie.tuhs.org> <20180622142846.GS21272@mcvoy.com> <20180622145402.GT21272@mcvoy.com> <20180622151751.BEK9i%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <20180622192505.mfig_%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <89e5ae21-ccc0-5c84-837b-120a1a7d9e26@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20180623144959.M9byU%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 17:31:06 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [TUHS] off-topic list X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Grant Taylor via TUHS Reply-To: Grant Taylor Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 06/23/2018 03:21 PM, Michael Parson wrote: > The first rule in my .procmailrc does this with formail: That works well for many. But it does not work at all for me. There are many additional factors that I have to consider: - I use different email addresses for different things. - Replies come to one email address. - Emails from the mailing list come to a different address. - Replies are direct and arrive sooner. - Emails from the mailing list are indirect and arrive later. This means that the emails I get from the mailing list are to different addresses than message that were CCed directly to me. - I want the copy from the mailing list. - I want to not arbitrarily toss the direct reply in case the message never arrives from the mailing list. > Doesn't move duplicates to the trash, it just prevents multiple copies > of the same message-id from being delivered at all. The 8192 specfies > how large of a cache (stored in ~/.msgid.cache) of message-ids to keep > track of. In light of the above facts, I can't simply reject subsequent copies of Message-IDs as that does not accomplish the aforementioned desires. I also want to move the existing message to the Trash folder instead of blindly removing it so that I have the option of going to Trash and recovering it via my MUA if I feel the need or desire to do so. What I do is quite likely extremely atypical. But it does what I want. I have my own esoteric reasons (some are better than others) for doing what I do. I'm happy to share if anyone is interested. -- Grant. . . . unix || die