From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22314 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2021 21:10:38 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Jan 2021 21:10:38 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E46B29C7F9; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:10:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A4C9C73D; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:10:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=mxes.net header.i=@mxes.net header.b="r6LYLp94"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9AD9B9C73D; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:10:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp-out-3.mxes.net (smtp-out-3.mxes.net [198.205.123.68]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF4E9C5FD for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:10:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from Customer-MUA (mua.mxes.net [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BE4475A1E; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 16:10:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mxes.net; s=mta; t=1611522621; bh=UcSMRWCtS7581Q/26FNCXfapxb+2BwqwQgRGnwxlACA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:From; b=r6LYLp94qBDDCpXxmpEbFuH6wv4SGc+XKKuHXQaW7omebSm7yzJafjrJgmcdT7Dxq ILV1ZWa5IU1cjC0FRY+BY3JjyKA1rpNG1pkGUcebO1YS3wUfJxEmLnjHaeeHOdn3hQ xQOr4vlnxgkqJXgNw4AZ/KJRKG53tzYGbZsSMIeI= From: "Ronald Natalie" To: "Rich Morin" , "TUHS main list" Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:10:19 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: eM_Client/8.1.979.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sent-To: Subject: Re: [TUHS] tangential unix question: whatever happened to NeWS? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ronald Natalie Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" >Too bad. X won (at least in Unixish systems) and, as Rob Pike put it: So= metimes when you fill a vacuum, it still sucks. Curiously, JavaScript (ano= ther Gosling effort) is in some ways the modern version of NeWS... > > You mean Java. JavaScript is a different language that Brendan Eich at=20 Netscape wrote for their browser. >