From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 727 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2021 21:12:59 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Mar 2021 21:12:59 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C80ED9B9B9; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:12:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844519B550; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:12:46 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=mxes.net header.i=@mxes.net header.b="XJFlc1p7"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4F7339B550; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:12:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp-out-4.mxes.net (smtp-out-4.mxes.net [198.205.123.69]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68F095074 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:12:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from Customer-MUA (mua.mxes.net [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DxM952MCHz3cBR; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:12:40 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mxes.net; s=mta; t=1615497162; bh=AK/iPpxJOg3gaOLen/iyJjoPA6PjGr1E/R504qZ2G+0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=XJFlc1p7g6XYbw3d6APOPs/AoB/2F4lzPlxeCP2qt9rgpDZhamlQqjl4blGY5Tn5A rTpylw3zBB/QMLCZ3tunOdvn3b9gJ288B0mEr5dVAZSI5A6Dc0naoIsUKjhDd9PFBb vrq5aNh79ilwFl5aeCi7R7xoif4Nx5F82KIYLclw= From: "Ron Natalie" To: "Lars Brinkhoff" , "Jan Schaumann" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:12:38 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <7wim5x5skj.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> References: <20210311200558.GW3990@netmeister.org> <7wim5x5skj.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: eM_Client/8.1.1054.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sent-To: Subject: Re: [TUHS] [COFF] Pondering the hosts file X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ron Natalie Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Ah, that brings back memories. It was after we got our own "private"=20 imps at BRL. The BRL hosts of the day had the name BRL-XNNN where the X was the name=20 of the division V - Vulnerability/Lethality Division S - Systems Engineering and Concepts Analysis Division T - Terminal Ballistics Division I - Interior Ballistics Division L - Launch and Flight Division. B appears becvaues SECAD was the Ballistic Modelling Division earlier. Mike wanted to callel BRL-SEM (the SECAD Experimental Machine) BRL-SEX=20 originally. Jake Fienler at the NIC refused to accept it.