From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5579 invoked from network); 3 May 2022 07:25:20 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 May 2022 07:25:20 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id DD01E9D48A; Tue, 3 May 2022 17:25:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD069D455; Tue, 3 May 2022 17:22:54 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ronnatalie.com header.i=@ronnatalie.com header.b="fCrpdfgW"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="XEBgsbm5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1164C9D455; Tue, 3 May 2022 17:22:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2AD9CE23 for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 17:22:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6265810EA for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 03:22:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 May 2022 03:22:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ronnatalie.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1651562570; x=1651569770; bh=Lk/Lwehu2NQ5HOgI0hl6Owt2du9AquO+cvf dttzkVXI=; b=fCrpdfgWx+PQCiy4tOC5hSevK7MVNrocFJkaPYsIt5NP0fcyF8V tMbEuwULEdsl+2ceOKskjI5Ov0Vq9k15GChSkJwTOobPfRlXFiacvjumrr8mg6mG O2L0qU+mdF8JyIfj2GInaMNalkMBSkkr2s39rVsEG1KoD4wJAoHzp27MnDUdhq11 qTNz1ugFQ4Lsis3iubvHUmVYwWsQ+9NiZa0Lio64n1NdhO/U44JsLw2kw5kfP1rj i0oFeqV5T28yDDfJs3iKfSkzn9CsX5N0r3VIPn2TbB8y7+sVsgO6oxT5jnIjHmpf 59HHxLMtxayX3LBJGV2UnmgKgyZcx8lNttw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1651562570; x=1651569770; bh=Lk/Lwehu2NQ5H OgI0hl6Owt2du9AquO+cvfdttzkVXI=; b=XEBgsbm5DHd2TjPgFgMeLp35HciRP A7K2Uv4o/Vd2INvQ6VzLmYUTBOIxh+pW0dY4fk849ftoJfpcCmbv1w162/ZfloA1 hMQQ9RDcABM8sQ+4gnB98h0l/mpVPX4irDen3ySnBlGvSiFV8hxVav6ax0lqTkPL aAHf5Ld33lP2fcT1GjUD8D6bopXQFdkTyQ+bAROr5flVY1maai9PE04vHHHNdbZT FvdEMwnphdJIfrUXxZU8wxqmkSZr5knfN6smcmwY7jSksWA3KevjgqzfjqhwHoaa 7JdmF6JISRHqmapPEotcXXTC9+/1qF6Z5bvxacdG7vM1X4DT/zFDkO7pg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdeigdduudejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfrhgfgggtgfesth hqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepfdftohhnrghlugcupfgrthgrlhhivgdfuceorhhonhes rhhonhhnrghtrghlihgvrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiheegfeevtedtte eggfelkeeiteeltdeftddtieegkefhleelvdejveetgeeuheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrohhnsehrohhnnhgrthgrlhhivg drtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 03:22:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ronald Natalie" To: TUHS Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 07:22:48 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <57977CE7-DDCC-4861-BBD2-843B9B9F51C2@ronnatalie.com> <202205020242.2422g30m074857@ultimate.com> User-Agent: eM_Client/9.0.1632.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [TUHS] First Unix-like OSes not derived from AT&T code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ronald Natalie Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" The screen was a IBM 6091, the IBM rebrand of a Sony tube. We had=20 serial number 2 in our office. Amusingly, the RT we had came all=20 locked up,. but I found that turning the key to the wrehch position and=20 booting it got me a maintenance shell that on one option invoked more=20 that I could shell escape out of to get.a root shell. There haven=E2=80= =99t=20 been too many UNIX systems I=E2=80=99ve not been able to get into. The=20 funniest was showing some guy in the Pentagon out to bust out of the=20 SunTools screen lock. IBM made a big thing about telling how the thing had a 24bit=20 framebuffer, but the *&@$&* X Server on it only had eight bit visuals. =20 I did a port of our code base to it because that was what I did back=20 then (we had the premier intelligence image processing system that ran=20 on just about any UNIX system out there: Sun (Spark and 68K), MIPS=20 (both the MIPS workstation and the DEC SPIM), SGI, Ardent, Stellar,=20 MassPar, Various 386 things (of which I was fond of the MultibusII=20 systems), HP, DEC Alpha, etc=E2=80=A6. We even ran on Apollo Domain and so= me of=20 the early NT for both the PC and the iTanic.