I’m not sure the model 33 required a carriage return delay.   At 110 baud it had plenty of time to move the carriage. back.
Other printers (especially faster ones) weren’t so lucky, but the LA36 decwriter had a catchup mode to print the backlog after a return.
The LA120 was boustrophedonic so returns weren’t as much of an issue.

------ Original Message ------
From "John P. Linderman" <jpl.jpl@gmail.com>
To jason-tuhs@shalott.net
Cc "steve jenkin" <sjenkin@canb.auug.org.au>; "TUHS" <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Date 11/2/2022 12:20:12 PM
Subject [TUHS] Re: Early Unix and Keyboard Skills



On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 3:02 PM <jason-tuhs@shalott.net> wrote:

> I’ve never heard anyone mention keyboard skills with the people of the
> CSRC - doesn’t anyone know?


https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Documentation/AUUGN/AUUGN-V05.4.pdf (p23)

> History tells us that the guys who designed [UNIX] did their own typing
> into the machine.  It seems to me that because of this, the main reason
> that UNIX enjoys/suffers from terse input and output is not through any
> intellectual design decisions made at some early stage but because the
> UNIX designers were just bad typists working on slow peripherals.


  -Jason

Mostly rampant speculation on my part, but with 110 baud modems, 10 characters per second right?,
and added delays for carriage returns, it was the peripherals that encouraged brevity. Code would be
viewed multiple times, but entered roughly once.