From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 10902 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2021 22:18:48 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Feb 2021 22:18:48 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 025BA9C7B7; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:18:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888B09503C; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:18:27 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=mxes.net header.i=@mxes.net header.b="SWx66Pkf"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 18BFE9503C; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:18:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp-out-4.mxes.net (smtp-out-4.mxes.net [198.205.123.69]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9178D94F1B for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:18:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from Customer-MUA (mua.mxes.net [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71F79759C1; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:18:16 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mxes.net; s=mta; t=1613168298; bh=iChSQ4ce26atTGRoll0ot4s3bE6eh5IqjtYrGznTS5E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=SWx66PkfRc6ZR+dRRvmd/qoSuqQxeaddFLx1cKE038u+Qzn8rM28LJ+shP/Zpni5U eEL8eBNarNwNO13MC0RSx3gU5d0r0wGuEbpnhMrnE+L3vjtYYT5jGIryYU03f4B02x eZNBzhR9uO6+TQLqVUwgdFiFFmaFIlxrL1TS1buc= From: "Ron Natalie" To: "Dave Horsfall" , "The Eunuchs Hysterical Society" Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:18:15 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <8b580c46-ecfb-9383-ed43-08108b3ee7bf@tllds.com> <20201130163753.GB18187@mcvoy.com> User-Agent: eM_Client/8.1.1054.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sent-To: Subject: Re: [TUHS] troff was not so widely usable (was: The UNIX Command Language (1976)) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ron Natalie Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" I hated those things. They were what we used for regular listings at=20 BRL and the chemicals made my skin break out. The chemicals also=20 reacted with the ink in the standard government issue felt tip pens=20 (which ironically were made by blind people) and caused your notes to=20 fade quickly (and the pens to stop working). ------ Original Message ------ From: "Dave Horsfall" To: "The Eunuchs Hysterical Society" Sent: 2/12/2021 5:13:22 PM Subject: Re: [TUHS] troff was not so widely usable (was: The UNIX=20 Command Language (1976)) >On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Greg A. Woods wrote: > >>I don't know if I've ever seen a Versatec plotter, though perhaps at a tr= ade show. > >The LV-11? We had one at Uni of NSW; it spent most of its time printing b= iorhythm charts which were all the rage back then. > >-- Dave