From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 12585 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2021 11:20:04 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Apr 2021 11:20:04 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A96639C09E; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 21:19:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2569BB68; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 21:19:36 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=andrewnesbit.org header.i=@andrewnesbit.org header.b="GXlb8UxD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 42B8C9BB66; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 21:19:33 +1000 (AEST) X-Greylist: delayed 368 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at minnie.tuhs.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 21:19:31 AEST Received: from fbo-4.mxes.net (fbo-4.mxes.net [198.205.123.79]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7DE99BB65 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 21:19:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp-out-4.mxes.net (smtp-out-4.mxes.net [198.205.123.69]) by fbi-4.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FGwVD2nxCz3cBF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 07:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Customer-MUA (mua.mxes.net [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FGwV756l7z3c9x; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 07:13:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=andrewnesbit.org; s=default; t=1617966801; bh=ZRa5dC32QOkAopHjmoq7UCEmRDn7MU1TGfXtK7rdNeo=; l=262; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GXlb8UxDcWZIRrv8rhw2sUeloYlywAY+DlTxW6rcEpugF9SkRmxnOdsVDLs0/kvOx LVPPvD0OU8GbDnT7Y3p5hs7Nvmptc4XMtRJAa8OxSuVtXgoT7YDf5T6lAKCRXmnkYz HioAGa2ltb7meOa2rMLZ9FzeBc63dVVeKwEwqxaQ= To: emanuel stiebler , Jason Stevens , 'Jon Steinhart ' , "'tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org '" References: <0F0B9BFC06289346B88512B91E55670D3012@EXCHANGE> <0f581f48-6f1e-0f7e-45e7-38469f4e4012@e-bbes.com> From: U'll Be King of the Stars Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:13:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0f581f48-6f1e-0f7e-45e7-38469f4e4012@e-bbes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sent-To: Subject: Re: [TUHS] SUN (Stanford University Network) was PC Unix X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 09/04/2021 11:12, emanuel stiebler wrote: > You're comparing a z80 SBC running CP/M? Or are you thinking of 68000 SBCs? I've never seen a 68k SBC. Have I missed out something along the way? Is there a community for 68k SBC's? Kind regards, Andrew