The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nemo Nusquam <cym224@gmail.com>
To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] History of m6?
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:07:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3eff4d6-1b19-e115-fa43-473812050d5f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1911120954561.11612@aneurin.horsfall.org>

On 11/11/19 17:58, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:10:26PM +0200, Arnold Robbins wrote:
>>> I guess I'll also ask, how widespread was the use of macro processors
>>> in high level languages?  They were big for assembler, and PL/1 had
>>> a macro language, but I don't know of any other contemporary languages
>>> that had them.  Were the general purpose macro processors used a lot?
>>> E.g. with Fortran or Cobol or ...
>
> Late trivia: it's PL/I, not PL/1; rumour has it that IBM trademarked 
> them all up to PL/C i.e. PL/100...

Found nothing on TESS.  Maybe copyright but I am not familiar with 
copyright.

>
>> Well, there's Ratfor (Rational Fortran), which was implemented as a 
>> preprocessor in front of Fortran.  I don't think it was used a lot, 
>> though....
>
> I think I used it once, on the principle that I'll try anything once; 
> ugh...

I worked for a company that wrote everything on ratfor.  #6-)

>
> -- Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-12  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-11 21:10 Arnold Robbins
2019-11-11 22:18 ` Dennis Boone
2019-11-12 16:01   ` Leah Neukirchen
2019-11-11 22:31 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-11-11 22:58   ` Dave Horsfall
2019-11-12  0:07     ` Nemo Nusquam [this message]
2019-11-12  0:39       ` Dave Horsfall
2019-11-12  0:30   ` Clem cole
2019-11-16 16:27     ` SPC
2019-11-17  5:30       ` Dave Horsfall
2019-11-17  5:50         ` Larry McVoy
2019-11-17 18:12           ` Bakul Shah
2019-11-17 18:23             ` Michael Kjörling
2019-11-17 18:56               ` Bakul Shah
2019-11-17 22:46             ` Barry Stanly
2019-11-12  0:42   ` Dennis Boone
2019-11-11 22:37 ` Michael Kjörling
2019-11-12  1:09 ` Steve Johnson
2019-11-12 15:07   ` Clem Cole
2019-11-13  9:16     ` Thomas Paulsen
2019-11-13 12:20       ` Lars Brinkhoff
2019-11-13 12:50         ` Mike Markowski
2019-11-13 13:02           ` Lars Brinkhoff
2019-11-13 16:56         ` Paul Winalski
2019-11-13 19:19           ` Lars Brinkhoff
2019-11-13 19:21             ` Jon Steinhart
2019-11-14  9:26         ` Thomas Paulsen
2019-11-14 10:53           ` Lars Brinkhoff
2019-11-13 21:26       ` Dave Horsfall
2019-11-13 22:53       ` Jaap Akkerhuis
2019-11-12 15:15 Doug McIlroy
2019-11-13  7:38 ` arnold
2019-11-13 10:55   ` David Arnold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3eff4d6-1b19-e115-fa43-473812050d5f@gmail.com \
    --to=cym224@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).