From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tih@hamartun.priv.no (Tom Ivar Helbekkmo) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:19:45 +0100 Subject: [TUHS] Pristine version of 2.11BSD In-Reply-To: <989f5535948b1e318c6fbf9c7c6cc181@xs4all.nl> (Jacob Goense's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:37:54 +0100") References: <20151214095115.GA16979@minnie.tuhs.org> <86vb81cofj.fsf@vps34351.public.cloudvps.com> <1839042C-5DC4-4B9B-B9F7-C9F47B2BACA2@tuhs.org> <0ed060b15f8e284a3008a38f0f58f44f@xs4all.nl> <20151217224317.GA29449@minnie.tuhs.org> <989f5535948b1e318c6fbf9c7c6cc181@xs4all.nl> Message-ID: Jacob Goense writes: > Grepping through the utzoo USENET archive I found one patch that might > help piecing this together. Post at http://oldbsd.org/c.b.2bsd.167.txt I found that one in Google's archive of comp.bugs.2bsd, too -- but there's a least one ld.c patch still missing, from November 1990. I just heard from Steven Schultz, who is surprised that we don't have the original 2.11 distribution in the archive. Steven says: > I was certain that a base 2.11 is in the TUHS archive. There was a > tapeset sent down under and I recall someone working on a way to > simulate a tape drive over a serial line so 2.11 could be loaded. Does this ring a bell, anyone? -tih -- Elections cannot be allowed to change anything. --Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble