From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 99223b5d for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 22:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C7BB6A2097; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 08:14:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E34A1B01; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 08:14:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key; unprotected) header.d=irreal.org header.i=@irreal.org header.b=AWZMkN+T; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8ECB9A1B01; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 08:14:41 +1000 (AEST) X-Greylist: delayed 1500 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at minnie.tuhs.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 08:14:40 AEST Received: from gateway8.unifiedlayer.com (gateway8.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.17.81]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B51A1A90 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 08:14:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from cm4.websitewelcome.com (unknown [108.167.139.16]) by gateway8.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D6B2007D15A for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 16:27:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from shared120.accountservergroup.com ([162.215.249.103]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id wDQUflmJKxLGAwDQUfFuzC; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 16:27:26 -0500 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=irreal.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Date:In-reply-to:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ddHck0NiBM5JvsZMeoYAUnaebbgp9mKw8AifNam6XWk=; b=AWZMkN+T9c/S2DrJsDopw9HwMn /LgAdtK8z3LJC1uN5P1SynG6ZoFOfxpMtbOhZzZ6VeU3zzqBLkYGetFcSwpXeE6tyX14eNF7ST3mY QKICysfRZoLBmbo05ZtmeYfFM5ruw3ErFUgsqjolQJmBJIRTTpDfXVdE6zHh/ONs/Q7Z9Dz1ZKJ7C 6H24tjJ02+szf2YZxfL75nNQHgKIsGHMANMO4NFpF3e7BFkImHGkJxTyomol3axAKGsRbwpXnWoC9 q7xUrZ8QkRmhvI3hAxsbJgdTcfUIBVVo9Q/bQ5kM7QBwU6dv+1M1ToU6bsYTKgoOK+Yj0vZ+qRDcd 4i32WjLA==; Received: from [35.140.216.86] (port=54778 helo=manfredII.local) by shared120.accountservergroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fwDQU-001RI6-7z; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 16:27:26 -0500 References: <899D86D7-1601-4FDA-869A-10EC46500D0D@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: jcs To: Will Senn In-reply-to: <899D86D7-1601-4FDA-869A-10EC46500D0D@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 17:27:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - shared120.accountservergroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - minnie.tuhs.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - irreal.org X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 35.140.216.86 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1fwDQU-001RI6-7z X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: (manfredII.local) [35.140.216.86]:54778 X-Source-Auth: jcs@irreal.org X-Email-Count: 4 X-Source-Cap: YzY3ODU3O2M2Nzg1NztzaGFyZWQxMjAuYWNjb3VudHNlcnZlcmdyb3VwLmNvbQ== X-Local-Domain: yes Subject: Re: [TUHS] Public access multics X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Will Senn writes: > So, it looks like someone has gone and started running a multics=20 > instance: > > http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/semibug/2018-August/000288.html > > That=E2=80=99s interesting, and y=E2=80=99all may even have been aware of= it.=20 > But, I was thinking that Multics was a failed predecessor of=20 > unix and it=E2=80=99s craziness an inspiration for how unix isn=E2=80=99t= =20 > multics... straighten me out :) Failed only in the sense that the Labs withdrew from the project.=20 Honeywell, which bought out GE's computer division, sold Multics=20 systems, although I don't remember them being very successful. The real mystery is what it's running on. Multics originally ran=20 on the GE/H 600(0) systems. I doubt any are still around. It's=20 probably a simulator but I've never heard of one for the H6000.