The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: segaloco via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org>
To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Dave Cutler recollection about Xenix
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 00:36:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <oZOTsmhpK0clmOyHjcgnyIxo-uEyQGpp7lgd6xAXsvMAeK_Xg5YBOUwr3uKqBap7QwAn2yjANeFoNPFB1edpu1JmZ1ZPkdLVTyX48RbyM_4=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA1C+h2q23JaAXvYvqpJGr8LuevJxY-xoYU3tK9QUORbkf8LLw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2343 bytes --]

I consistently hear from folks the same about Bill Gates pushing for volume over anything else with Xenix. I wonder to what degree that sort of paradigm shift lead to what we see today with "app stores" and cheap little apps being peddled a dime a dozen. Must be a viable enough business model if people keep doing it, but it makes me die inside. There's also the fact though that as the barrier to entry goes down, well, more folks enter the playing field.

Also I gotta appreciate that Dave Cutler's Bill Gates impersonation is consistent with other folks mocking over the years. He's probably got a pretty thick skin by this point (although the financial success probably helps).

Thanks for the share, there are a few other videos linked there from I assume the same interview, I quite enjoyed them, especially the anecdote of Steve Ballmer's last ditch effort Denny's breakfast to bring Dave on board.

Something this brings back to mind that I always wonder about with Microsoft and their OS choices: So they went with Windows NT for their kernel, scraped the Windows environment off the top of DOS and dolloped it on top. Has there been any explanation over the years why they also decided to keep the MSDOS CLI interface? It's not like the NT kernel couldn't handle simple stuff like a UNIX-y shell, tools like grep and sed, etc. and Microsoft had code in Xenix they probably could've considered using for that. Was it not wanting to have any licensing questions by avoiding anything that smelled like Xenix at all? Or was the consumer base at the time that invested in the MSDOS environment that handing them a Bourne shell with some ubiquitous UNIX tools would've just been unworkable? Feels like a lost opportunity, they could've had their kernel and their desktop environment and still given folks a more robust CLI. Instead stuff like UWIN, Cygwin, etc. had to come along and fill the void. That was something I was hoping he'd talk about when I clicked, but I didn't catch anything particular about the CLI choice.

- Matt G.
------- Original Message -------
On Friday, October 20th, 2023 at 4:27 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <fariborz.t@gmail.com> wrote:

> This might be interesting to some. It is a piece of a longer conversation between Dave Plummer and Dave Cutler (RSX11, VMS, WinNT)
>
> https://youtu.be/9K3eMzF6x28?feature=shared

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3816 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-21  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-20 23:27 [TUHS] " Skip Tavakkolian
2023-10-21  0:36 ` segaloco via TUHS [this message]
2023-10-21  0:53   ` [TUHS] " Steve Nickolas
2023-10-21  1:04     ` Jim Geist
2023-10-21  2:29       ` Dave Horsfall
2023-10-21  2:27   ` John Cowan
2023-10-21  6:27 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2023-10-21  7:11   ` steve jenkin
2023-10-21 18:21 ` Stuff Received
2023-10-21 15:36 Paul Ruizendaal
2023-10-21 16:38 ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-10-21 16:40 ` John Cowan
2023-10-24  7:58   ` Sebastien F4GRX
2023-10-22 16:44 ` Paul Winalski
2023-10-22 16:56   ` Jim Geist

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='oZOTsmhpK0clmOyHjcgnyIxo-uEyQGpp7lgd6xAXsvMAeK_Xg5YBOUwr3uKqBap7QwAn2yjANeFoNPFB1edpu1JmZ1ZPkdLVTyX48RbyM_4=@protonmail.com' \
    --to=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    --cc=segaloco@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).