From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CAD2FAF6
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:05:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BFD4318D;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:05:08 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741B44317E
	for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 01:05:03 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <goug-tuhs@m.gmane-mx.org>)
	id 1tD3JF-0009tS-M8
	for tuhs@tuhs.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:05:01 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
From: Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:00:22 -0000 (UTC)
Sender: <ant@tilde.club>
Message-ID: <vhfkq6$2r5$2@ciao.gmane.io>
References: <CAKH6PiUS7RjkCyuYREFk4Li+aORaEZ_Vu7Dg1nnsFuHJF+mqog@mail.gmail.com> <CAKzdPgwJ7-_BWztOQKiB6h5a+OGwXtefsD47Fq+GDwGGF7N4UA@mail.gmail.com> <20240930191216.tIpea9lo@steffen%sdaoden.eu> <CACY3YMHzg+6U_zTuhMTORgfh_Kse6MTspaGDfuUjXb4vLvV9mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEoi9W46LRBBxQ22kM8kmvqHeTetXkp=jfUeDC+qu0kbvv+swA@mail.gmail.com> <vhfa99$114r$1@ciao.gmane.io> <ab1460cd-2380-1459-9db8-764306db4d44@makerlisp.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.2411180904240.6648@sd-119843.dedibox.fr>
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.10.8-100.fc39.x86_64 (x86_64))
Message-ID-Hash: ZQB26GNXWKGVDMXLNZAF2ABE6GRUMAXA
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZQB26GNXWKGVDMXLNZAF2ABE6GRUMAXA
X-MailFrom: goug-tuhs@m.gmane-mx.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1
Precedence: list
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Minimum Array Sizes in 16 bit C (was Maximum)
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.tuhs.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/message/ZQB26GNXWKGVDMXLNZAF2ABE6GRUMAXA/>
List-Archive: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tuhs-owner@tuhs.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@tuhs.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tuhs-join@tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tuhs-leave@tuhs.org>

Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> wrote:
>
>I feel like most of the changes to C after C89 were a waste.  Apart
>from stdint.h, I mostly keep to coding in strict C89.

And then I must not only specfy std-c89 in GCC, but add --pedantic, too.
There is even a --pedantic club: <https://pedantic.software/> .