New comment by flexibeast on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/16043#issuecomment-549186824

Comment:
Thanks for your feedback!

i'm actually new to Void myself: i've only just started contributing, primarily in the area of documentation (though i've also added a package, `hunspell-en_AU`, in #13620). So i'm not one of the Void devs, and i can't comment on everything you've mentioned; but i can speak to some of the things you mentioned.

> what is xbump and where is the manual?

`xbump` is part of the `xtools` package; the man page for `xtools` says:

> xbump pkgname [git commit options] – Git commit a version bump

Could you please point to the place where `xbump` was mentioned but not explained?

> you need a forum for each subporject (like the documentation

This is already in place: see the projects listed at https://github.com/void-linux/, amongst which is the void-docs project, which has its own issue tracker.

> Also there is a wiki-void but link is not in the main site, why? how do you expect ppl to find this?

This is deliberate, as the wiki is deprecated; see [issue #104 in the void-docs repo](https://github.com/void-linux/void-docs/issues/104). i agree that whilst the wiki is still online and visible to search engines, it would be good to let people know that it should no longer be used. Myself and @bobertlo have made some suggestions about this ([here](https://github.com/void-linux/void-docs/issues/104#issuecomment-529082008) and [here](https://github.com/void-linux/void-docs/issues/104#issuecomment-546606159)), but as Void is a volunteer-run project, it relies on the relevant Void devs having the time and space to address these suggestions.

> The void site need to be rewritten with the major resources on the top.

Well, the navigation bar at the top of the Void home page has a "Documentation" entry which links to https://docs.voidlinux.org/; and, yeah, the wiki is not listed alongside it because the wiki is no longer considered an official resource.