New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/20272#issuecomment-602391438

Comment:
Well, according to voidlinux.org/packages, this package was only succesfully built for aarch64, both glibc and musl, and x86_64, only glibc. So it doesn't have the best history in cross-compilation. Right now both x86_64 targets are working (which is better than before), but aarch64 isn't. That wouldn't make for a great update, I think.

What do you think about creating a separate package for the pam module and rule? Something like pam_fscrypt? This way the packages might get too fragmented, though.

Overall I feel like adding the pam module in some way is pretty important, because it enables what I feel is the most useful part of fscrypt.