From: st3r4g <st3r4g@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: New cyclic dependency
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:35:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417163551.QYYzExg8XVY2y_qlt-IFcKlQTZVMJJx7xsAU4boshAw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-20438@inbox.vuxu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 947 bytes --]
New comment by st3r4g on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/20438#issuecomment-615345691
Comment:
> @st3r4g: When dependencies are build after desired package is indexed, and some transitive dependency fail to build, one end up with non-installable package and no easy way to build just what is missing. Currently, it is enough to fix failing package and build desired package again.
>
> Complete solution may need a temporary area of packages visible to xbps-src, but not indexed yet.
Exactly, the index must be updated only after all runtime dependencies are built successfully. In https://github.com/void-linux/xbps/issues/259 a new tool was proposed to handle proper indexing of packages (in a multi-repo aware way). So if such tool is made, we can postpone building runtime deps and let the new tool do the shlibs checks and rundeps checks, so that repo index has always installable packages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-29 10:12 [ISSUE] " pullmoll
2020-03-29 23:33 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 15:11 ` xtraeme
2020-04-15 15:18 ` xtraeme
2020-04-15 15:37 ` xtraeme
2020-04-15 15:39 ` xtraeme
2020-04-15 15:42 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " xtraeme
2020-04-15 19:28 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:28 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:35 ` xtraeme
2020-04-15 19:36 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:37 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:37 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:38 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:39 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:40 ` st3r4g
2020-04-15 19:58 ` xtraeme
2020-04-15 20:00 ` xtraeme
2020-04-17 16:12 ` Chocimier
2020-04-17 16:35 ` st3r4g [this message]
2020-04-17 16:37 ` st3r4g
2020-05-17 9:17 ` st3r4g
2021-02-05 3:36 ` Can xbps-src work around runtime cyclic dependencies instead of requiring manually split templates? ericonr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200417163551.QYYzExg8XVY2y_qlt-IFcKlQTZVMJJx7xsAU4boshAw@z \
--to=st3r4g@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).