[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --] New issue by 0n-s on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166 Description: The `font-iosevka` package has Iosevka & Iosevka Slab, but it's missing the newer (>=3.0.0, the current package is 3.0.1 so these should be present) Iosevka Curly, Iosevka Curly Slab & also the quasi-proportional fonts Iosevka Aile, Iosevka Etoile, & Iosevka Sparkle.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 223 bytes --] New comment by MatthiasGrandl on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-632646804 Comment: Yeah I think they should be included as well! Really beautiful typefaces!
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 529 bytes --] New comment by georgianfire on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-633163750 Comment: I can add those fonts but I think it may not be a good idea to pack all the variants in a single package since there are so many of them. What about we learn from Arch (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=ttf-iosevka) and put each variant in a separate package? Maybe even the slab variant should be in a separate package. Some input on to implement this would be appreciated.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --] New comment by MatthiasGrandl on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-633181549 Comment: @georgianfire mhm will I agree, that putting all of the fonts into one package is pretty bloated, I think the Arch example might be too big of a hassle to maintain... No strong opinions on this though.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1261 bytes --] New comment by linkert on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-667940746 Comment: Want to hijack this issue. I previously had Iosevka all-over my system gtk, qt, in browser, terminal, file manager, text editor - everything was set to one of the variants term, aile, etoile or sparkle. Then I had the variants locally and manually installed. I did not know until recently that there was an Iosevka package in the repos - was happy to find out there was! However it's, to me, incomplete. What about a compromise? I get that one does not want the "SS01, SS02, SS..." variants that are supposed to emulate other fonts(? not sure I get the use?) and they probably should be separated. But the core thing that IS Iosevka as an all-in-one - yes please that would be magical. If someone want all of it: ```font-iosevka-ss:``` - Iosevka SS01, 02, 03, 04 et cetera.. ```font-iosevka:``` - Iosevka - Iosevka Term - Iosevka Fixed - Iosevka Slab - Iosevka Term Slab - Iosevka Fixed Slab - Iosevka Curly - Iosevka Term Curly - Iosevka Fixed Curly - Iosevka Curly Slab - Iosevka Term Curly Slab - Iosevka Fixed Curly Slab - Iosevka Aile - Iosevka Etoile - Iosevka Sparkle
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1284 bytes --] New comment by linkert on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-667940746 Comment: Want to hijack this issue. I previously had Iosevka all-over my system gtk, qt, in browser, terminal, file manager, text editor - everything was set to one of the variants term, aile, etoile or sparkle. Then I had the variants locally and manually installed. I did not know until recently that there was an Iosevka package in the repos - was happy to find out there was! However it's, to me, incomplete. What about a compromise? I get that one does not want the "SS01, SS02, SS..." variants that are supposed to emulate other fonts(? not sure I get the use?) and they probably should be separated. But the core thing that IS Iosevka as an all-in-one - yes please that would be magical. If someone want all of it, install both packages: ```font-iosevka-ss:``` - Iosevka SS01, 02, 03, 04 et cetera.. ```font-iosevka:``` - Iosevka - Iosevka Term - Iosevka Fixed - Iosevka Slab - Iosevka Term Slab - Iosevka Fixed Slab - Iosevka Curly - Iosevka Term Curly - Iosevka Fixed Curly - Iosevka Curly Slab - Iosevka Term Curly Slab - Iosevka Fixed Curly Slab - Iosevka Aile - Iosevka Etoile - Iosevka Sparkle
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --] Closed issue by 0n-s on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166 Description: The `font-iosevka` package has Iosevka & Iosevka Slab, but it's missing the newer (>=3.0.0, the current package is 3.0.1 so these should be present) Iosevka Curly, Iosevka Curly Slab & also the quasi-proportional fonts Iosevka Aile, Iosevka Etoile, & Iosevka Sparkle.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --] New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-668234779 Comment: It's unlikely more variants will be accepted, we are already limiting number of fonts in repo.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 467 bytes --] New comment by linkert on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-668377091 Comment: > It's unlikely more variants will be accepted, we are already limiting number of fonts in repo. You closed this issue but the issue is not resolved. The font-iosevka package is half a package since half of what the github repo contains is left out. What's the Void stance on font packages? What's the issue with them?
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 419 bytes --] New comment by Chocimier on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-668385271 Comment: > What's the Void stance on font packages? We think they do not [need](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements) to be packaged as pure data. > You closed this issue but the issue is not resolved. Ok, marked as wontfix.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --] New comment by linkert on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/22166#issuecomment-668388914 Comment: > > What's the Void stance on font packages? > > We think they do not [need](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements) to be packaged as pure data. I would then suggest putting this stance into practice and purging all non-required fonts-, icons- and theme packages (and whatever else might be in the repo that does not fit). That way I won't go all happy when I see a package for Iosevka only to be let down by the fact that it's a dismembered dud of a package. It's a sound policy and stance which I agree with for the most part - but I could see "popular demand" as an addition - might submit a PR :)