New comment by sgn on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/22353#issuecomment-637196278

Comment:
On 2020-06-01 13:41:07-0700, Piotr <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> Aah, I'm late, but still.
> 
> Renaming package break build of out-of tree packages; invalidates
> `hold`, `repolock`, `ignores` and similar custom settings.
> If package was installed manually, transitional package is required,
> because `replaces=` causes package to be
> [uninstalled](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/11816#issuecomment-493770733),
> and there is no safe enough period after which transitional package
> could be removed without breaking [otherwise working
> updates](https://www.michaelwashere.net/post/2017-09-24-upgrading-the-ancient/).

I agree with this point.
I /thought/ python3-scard was pulled by yubikey-manager for most of
users, hence I /thought/ it's safe enough.

> If gain is purely aestethic, I would like to ask to not rename.

I fear that a day will come and there is a Python package named scard.
Looking at other packages, I think it's 100% possible.

> You could point me merging similar renames. Please do not repeat my mistakes.

OK.
Does it make sense to create a transitional package now?

-- 
Danh