New review comment by fosslinux on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/23646#discussion_r458583503

Comment:
@ericonr that's kinda silly IMO, that the binaries are in there, but w/e, you're right

@dkosovic So `glib-devel` is still good here. But, for future reference `glib-devel` actually contains different content to `libglib-devel`. This is because, in void's packaging system, a symlink just means "use this template". As you can see [here](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/srcpkgs/glib/template#L26) and [here](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/srcpkgs/glib/template#L38), they are both from the same template `glib`. It's just that the files get moved out to those "subpackages". So, despite them being symlinks, they actually have different content. Two subpackages from the same template can be necessary, as they are in this case :) HTH