New comment by sgn on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/23485#issuecomment-663808555

Comment:
On 2020-07-23 19:15:17-0700, "Andrew J. Hesford" <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> I like supporting the `check` mechanism in @sgn's template and,
> given that tests failing, marking broken on musl seems appropriate.

Yes, considering this package touch filesystem level, I don't think
it's acceptable to ship a broken package.

> If we're going to remove the (not very helpful) man page on
> cross-built packages, we should remove it everywhere. Native-built
> and cross-built packages for the same architecture should have the
> same contents.

Don't know, there're packages that have different contents in
native-build and cross build. Removing manpages for this one looks
fine. help2man is useless anyway.

-- 
Danh