From: fosslinux <fosslinux@users.noreply.github.com>
To: ml@inbox.vuxu.org
Subject: Re: [wip] common: disable creation of noarch packages.
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:32:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820063231.MYmdSi4SvQ1wmFeBYhUXuMBwgUaWgoXhDrYAvtwkpvY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gh-mailinglist-notifications-41a7ca26-5023-4802-975b-f1789d68868e-void-packages-24357@inbox.vuxu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]
New comment by fosslinux on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/24357#issuecomment-677287787
Comment:
After some discussion on IRC. I believe the best way forward is to drop *any* distinction between data and normal packages, i.e. drop noarch, no `noexecutable=yes`, nothing like that, and instead improve the strip/debug/shlibprovides hooks to be faster. I am working on the strip hook now, there's some pretty clear optimizations that can be done. <sub>(Yes, I know I was saying keep a shorthand before, but I wasn't very well versed on how these things worked and now I have been otherwise convinced).</sub>
Also, as per @the-maldridge 's suggestion above, `archs=noarch` will be removed from every package at once.
I'll fix up this PR very soon.
Do we want to revbump noarch packages, or not?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-19 6:51 [PR PATCH] " fosslinux
2020-08-19 12:23 ` ericonr
2020-08-19 12:38 ` ahesford
2020-08-19 12:46 ` ahesford
2020-08-19 13:03 ` Chocimier
2020-08-19 14:48 ` q66
2020-08-19 15:24 ` ahesford
2020-08-19 15:43 ` q66
2020-08-19 15:45 ` q66
2020-08-19 16:10 ` ahesford
2020-08-19 17:15 ` q66
2020-08-19 17:17 ` ericonr
2020-08-19 17:19 ` q66
2020-08-19 23:05 ` fosslinux
2020-08-19 23:10 ` fosslinux
2020-08-19 23:21 ` the-maldridge
2020-08-19 23:28 ` fosslinux
2020-08-19 23:30 ` the-maldridge
2020-08-20 0:24 ` q66
2020-08-20 0:38 ` fosslinux
2020-08-20 0:44 ` sgn
2020-08-20 0:44 ` sgn
2020-08-20 0:46 ` ericonr
2020-08-20 0:51 ` sgn
2020-08-20 0:56 ` fosslinux
2020-08-20 1:00 ` ahesford
2020-08-20 1:08 ` ericonr
2020-08-20 2:05 ` the-maldridge
2020-08-20 6:29 ` fosslinux
2020-08-20 6:32 ` fosslinux [this message]
2020-08-20 12:52 ` ericonr
2020-08-20 17:55 ` the-maldridge
2020-08-20 23:09 ` fosslinux
2020-08-21 22:26 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " fosslinux
2020-08-21 22:27 ` fosslinux
2020-08-21 22:29 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " fosslinux
2020-08-21 22:29 ` fosslinux
2020-08-24 23:49 ` fosslinux
2020-08-24 23:50 ` fosslinux
2020-08-24 23:50 ` fosslinux
2020-08-25 19:47 ` [PR REVIEW] " Chocimier
2020-08-25 19:49 ` Chocimier
2020-08-25 20:02 ` ericonr
2020-08-25 20:19 ` [PR REVIEW] " Chocimier
2020-08-25 22:55 ` fosslinux
2020-08-25 22:58 ` fosslinux
2020-08-27 7:22 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " fosslinux
2020-08-27 7:22 ` fosslinux
2020-08-27 7:23 ` fosslinux
2020-08-27 20:21 ` [PR REVIEW] " Chocimier
2020-08-27 20:28 ` Chocimier
2020-08-28 0:41 ` [PR REVIEW] " fosslinux
2020-08-28 0:43 ` fosslinux
2020-08-28 0:45 ` sgn
2020-08-28 1:07 ` fosslinux
2020-09-02 0:40 ` fosslinux
2020-09-02 0:40 ` fosslinux
2020-09-02 0:40 ` [PR REVIEW] " fosslinux
2020-09-03 23:47 ` fosslinux
2020-09-04 11:41 ` fosslinux
2020-09-04 11:44 ` fosslinux
2020-09-04 13:24 ` ahesford
2020-09-04 22:59 ` fosslinux
2020-09-04 23:17 ` fosslinux
2020-09-04 23:19 ` [PR PATCH] [Updated] " fosslinux
2020-09-04 23:19 ` [PR REVIEW] " fosslinux
2020-09-05 7:00 ` Chocimier
2020-09-05 7:16 ` fosslinux
2020-10-31 6:49 ` fosslinux
2020-10-31 6:49 ` fosslinux
2020-10-31 6:49 ` fosslinux
2020-10-31 6:49 ` fosslinux
2020-11-30 14:57 ` sgn
2020-11-30 16:37 ` sgn
2020-12-01 12:47 ` sgn
2020-12-05 10:17 ` sgn
2020-12-05 10:17 ` sgn
2020-12-15 11:26 ` fosslinux
2020-12-26 2:47 ` sgn
2020-12-26 2:48 ` sgn
2020-12-26 2:48 ` sgn
2020-12-26 2:48 ` sgn
2020-12-26 6:34 ` sgn
2020-12-26 6:42 ` sgn
2020-12-26 11:04 ` sgn
2020-12-26 11:04 ` sgn
2020-12-27 14:31 ` sgn
2021-01-20 12:34 ` [PR PATCH] [Closed]: " q66
2021-01-20 21:47 ` fosslinux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200820063231.MYmdSi4SvQ1wmFeBYhUXuMBwgUaWgoXhDrYAvtwkpvY@z \
--to=fosslinux@users.noreply.github.com \
--cc=ml@inbox.vuxu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).