There's a merged pull request on the void-packages repository

New package: pounce 1.4p2
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/24244

Description:
Pounce package contains 2 executables - `calico` and `pounce`. `pounce` is a bouncer which can connect only to **one** network. `pounce` usually listens on a unix socket and `calico` listens on a TCP port dispatching connections to running instances of pounce.

For example `znc` can connect to multiple networks at once, so it makes sense to have a service file for it. Should `pounce` or `calico` have sv services? I don't think it would make sense for pounce since users will probably have to have multiple service files with different command in each one. `calico` service doesn't make sense too, because there is not a standard location of pounce unix sockets, it has to be configured by users.

An alternative would be adding example service files in `/usr/share/examples`