* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
@ 2020-09-10 10:29 ` kartikynwa
2020-09-10 11:28 ` flexibeast
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: kartikynwa @ 2020-09-10 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 292 bytes --]
New comment by kartikynwa on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690140815
Comment:
https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/
I don't understand the license for this. Are we permitted to distribute this from Void's package manager?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
2020-09-10 10:29 ` kartikynwa
@ 2020-09-10 11:28 ` flexibeast
2020-09-10 12:19 ` kartikynwa
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: flexibeast @ 2020-09-10 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 257 bytes --]
New comment by flexibeast on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690188377
Comment:
@kartikynwa: Looking at [the FAQ](https://www.aseprite.org/faq/#can-i-redistribute-aseprite), i would guess no.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
2020-09-10 10:29 ` kartikynwa
2020-09-10 11:28 ` flexibeast
@ 2020-09-10 12:19 ` kartikynwa
2020-09-10 12:50 ` martnnw
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: kartikynwa @ 2020-09-10 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]
New comment by kartikynwa on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690241644
Comment:
A restricted package should work, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 12:19 ` kartikynwa
@ 2020-09-10 12:50 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 12:50 ` martnnw
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690263023
Comment:
There is also [LibreSprite](https://github.com/LibreSprite/LibreSprite) which was forked from Asprite when it was still gpl2 licenced.
When the void Maintainers don't wan't to package Asprite this would be the next best alternative.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 12:50 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 12:50 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 16:10 ` siduck765
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 377 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690263023
Comment:
There is also [LibreSprite](https://github.com/LibreSprite/LibreSprite) which was forked from Asprite when it was still gpl2 licenced.
If the void Maintainers don't wan't to package Asprite this would be the next best alternative.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 12:50 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 16:10 ` siduck765
2020-09-10 17:46 ` ericonr
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: siduck765 @ 2020-09-10 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 371 bytes --]
New comment by siduck765 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690419805
Comment:
> https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/
>
> I don't understand the license for this. Are we permitted to distribute this from Void's package manager?
its available on aur and many repos tho , its paid but completely OSS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 16:10 ` siduck765
@ 2020-09-10 17:46 ` ericonr
2020-09-10 20:48 ` rc-05
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ericonr @ 2020-09-10 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 231 bytes --]
New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690568231
Comment:
If it's on the AUR it's still being built locally, so it isn't breaking licensing terms.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 17:46 ` ericonr
@ 2020-09-10 20:48 ` rc-05
2020-09-10 21:10 ` martnnw
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rc-05 @ 2020-09-10 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 507 bytes --]
New comment by rc-05 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690718401
Comment:
> There is also [LibreSprite](https://github.com/LibreSprite/LibreSprite) which was forked from Asprite when it was still gpl2 licenced.
>
> If the void Maintainers don't wan't to package Asprite this would be the next best alternative.
I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 20:48 ` rc-05
@ 2020-09-10 21:10 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:13 ` martnnw
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 695 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690733337
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense).
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:10 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:13 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:14 ` martnnw
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690735007
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense).
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:13 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:14 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:16 ` martnnw
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 695 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690733337
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense).
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:14 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:16 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:17 ` martnnw
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 377 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690263023
Comment:
There is also [LibreSprite](https://github.com/LibreSprite/LibreSprite) which was forked from Asprite when it was still gpl2 licenced.
If the void maintainers don't wan't to package Asprite this would be the next best alternative.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:16 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:17 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:18 ` martnnw
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 720 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690735007
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense). So far as I understand.
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:17 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:18 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:26 ` rc-05
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 701 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690735007
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense) IIRC.
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:18 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:26 ` rc-05
2020-09-10 21:26 ` martnnw
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rc-05 @ 2020-09-10 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 946 bytes --]
New comment by rc-05 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690741132
Comment:
> > I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
>
> It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense) IIRC.
>
> Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
>
> > (g) Source code.
> > You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
So the restricted package can be created in a way that downloads a tarball of the source code of a specific version, but honestly I would just package the libre alternative as to completely avoid licensing issues and what not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:26 ` rc-05
@ 2020-09-10 21:26 ` martnnw
2020-09-10 21:41 ` martnnw
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690735007
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense) IIRC.
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord). Like ericonr already suspected.
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:26 ` martnnw
@ 2020-09-10 21:41 ` martnnw
2020-11-30 6:14 ` kotajacob
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: martnnw @ 2020-09-10 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 777 bytes --]
New comment by martnnw on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690735007
Comment:
> I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense) IIRC.
Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord). Like ericonr already said, if it's built locally it does not break the EULA.
> (g) Source code.
You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-10 21:41 ` martnnw
@ 2020-11-30 6:14 ` kotajacob
2021-11-24 22:19 ` notthewave
2022-01-22 13:55 ` kintrix007
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: kotajacob @ 2020-11-30 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 382 bytes --]
New comment by kotajacob on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-735572887
Comment:
Does looks like libresprite is unmaintained / lacking developers. The latest release is the last foss release of aseprite from 2016... I mean if it works it works, but I think they've only changed the branding and updated the build deps.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-30 6:14 ` kotajacob
@ 2021-11-24 22:19 ` notthewave
2022-01-22 13:55 ` kintrix007
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: notthewave @ 2021-11-24 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]
New comment by notthewave on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-978338374
Comment:
Libresprite seems actively maintained now. They released a 1.0 version 8 days ago.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: package request : Aseprite
2020-09-10 5:56 [ISSUE] package request : Aseprite siduck765
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-24 22:19 ` notthewave
@ 2022-01-22 13:55 ` kintrix007
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: kintrix007 @ 2022-01-22 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 334 bytes --]
New comment by kintrix007 on void-packages repository
https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-1019273767
Comment:
I would personally prefer if both LibreSprite and Aseprite made it into the packages, Aseprite obviously as a restricted one. As far as I know many people like Aseprite more, after all...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread