New comment by rc-05 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24800#issuecomment-690741132

Comment:
> > I think that it's better to package the libre fork of Aseprite directly (thus completely ditching the proprietary version).
> 
> It's OSS but not Free Software (in the FSF sense) IIRC.
> 
> Reading the EULA it seems that the only way to distribute Asprite on void is to provide a template that the user of the application needs to self compile using xbps-src (similar to discord).
> 
> > (g) Source code.
> > You may only compile and modify the source code of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT for your own personal purpose or to propose a contribution to the SOFTWARE PRODUCT.

So the restricted package can be created in a way that downloads a tarball of the source code of a specific version, but honestly I would just package the libre alternative as to completely avoid licensing issues and what not.