* [ISSUE] Radicale update @ 2020-09-16 15:28 teldra 2020-09-16 16:32 ` teldra 2020-09-16 16:32 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " teldra 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: teldra @ 2020-09-16 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ml [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --] New issue by teldra on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24944 Description: We have `radicale` which is superseded by `radicale2` and their db seem to be incompatible. (Thats the reason, why `radicale2` was introduced.) Now there is `radicale-3.x` released and I wonder, if I should just update `radicale` or `radicale2` to `radicale-3.x` or introduce `radicale3`. The databases of `radicale2` and `radicale3` are compatible (tested) nut user needs to manage some changes to its configfile. (<https://github.com/Kozea/Radicale/blob/3.0.x/NEWS.md#upgrade-checklist>). I don't know, if radicale-1.x or radicale-2.x will be updated in the future. What is best practice here? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Radicale update 2020-09-16 15:28 [ISSUE] Radicale update teldra @ 2020-09-16 16:32 ` teldra 2020-09-16 16:32 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " teldra 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: teldra @ 2020-09-16 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ml [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 206 bytes --] New comment by teldra on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24944#issuecomment-693521501 Comment: https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/23908 done here ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ISSUE] [CLOSED] Radicale update 2020-09-16 15:28 [ISSUE] Radicale update teldra 2020-09-16 16:32 ` teldra @ 2020-09-16 16:32 ` teldra 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: teldra @ 2020-09-16 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ml [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 725 bytes --] Closed issue by teldra on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/24944 Description: We have `radicale` which is superseded by `radicale2` and their db seem to be incompatible. (Thats the reason, why `radicale2` was introduced.) Now there is `radicale-3.x` released and I wonder, if I should just update `radicale` or `radicale2` to `radicale-3.x` or introduce `radicale3`. The databases of `radicale2` and `radicale3` are compatible (tested) but user needs to manage some changes to its configfile. (<https://github.com/Kozea/Radicale/blob/3.0.x/NEWS.md#upgrade-checklist>). I don't know, if radicale-1.x or radicale-2.x will be updated in the future. What is best practice here? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-16 16:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-09-16 15:28 [ISSUE] Radicale update teldra 2020-09-16 16:32 ` teldra 2020-09-16 16:32 ` [ISSUE] [CLOSED] " teldra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).