New review comment by gbrlsnchs on void-packages repository https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/25101#discussion_r495202512 Comment: For this case, I agree, the right thing should be to have `packr2` as proposed from its original authors [here](https://github.com/gobuffalo/packr/blob/master/v2/README.md). Maybe I should name the package `packr2` instead of `packr`?