New comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/26631#issuecomment-733400639

Comment:
I think the question isn't whether the new `antimicrox` pulls in more libs or offers new functionality, it's whether key functionality of the old `antimicro` is missing from the new package. If nothing is missing, I think the transition should be forced here, otherwise we are left with a stale package that will break with the next time there is a dependency shlib bump. (And with qt5, I'm sure that's coming.) That's more trouble than it's worth, and users can hold their local packages if they care enough.

If key functionality is missing in the new `antimicrox`, that's a separate issue.