New comment by shahab-vahedi on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/26861#issuecomment-736564215

Comment:
> Would you mind using the patch directly from fedora?
Done!

> Also, using `vsnprintf` means you can lose information, even if it avoids the buffer overflows...
If one doesn't one to lose the data, then the `bigbuf` should be handled dynamically. That would be a more error-prone patch than this one. Given a `*** buffer overflow detected ***: expect terminated`, I think loosing the data at offsets _2000+_ should be OK.