New comment by thypon on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/28007#issuecomment-763200561

Comment:
I had a quick chat with tsys, the guy that mainlined that DTC definition and maintained the manjaro linux pinebook kernel. He told me that he was using the overclock on manjaro because he was sure the first batch was supporting higher clock. He is not sure any other batch supported that higher speed, so he mainlined a more conservative profile.

He added that it should not be possible to be sure of the correct profile if we don't ask directly to rockchip.

I'm now running the patched version since some days with heavy duty tasks + browsing, the W usage is very mild (6-8), even on battery. I don't believe it will be a dangerous mod.

While there is usually a correct profile, when the vendor step in, I don't believe my one is more or less dangerous at the moment, and, due to the fact that we run a OP1 profile until now I don't see how that will be an issue while we still use a distinct kernel for pinebook wrt generic arm64 builds.