There is an updated pull request by ar-jan against master on the void-packages repository https://github.com/ar-jan/void-packages electrum-409 https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/28305 Update Electrum to 4.0.9 #### General - [ ] This is a new package and it conforms to the [quality requirements](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/master/Manual.md#quality-requirements) #### Have the results of the proposed changes been tested? - [x] I use the packages affected by the proposed changes on a regular basis and confirm this PR works for me - [ ] I generally don't use the affected packages but briefly tested this PR #### Does it build and run successfully? (Please choose at least one native build and, if supported, at least one cross build. More are better.) - [x] I built this PR locally for my native architecture, (ARCH-LIBC) - [ ] I built this PR locally for these architectures (if supported. mark crossbuilds): - [ ] aarch64-musl - [ ] armv7l - [ ] armv6l-musl ~This depends on #28272.~ ~Using package [libbitcoin-secp256k1](https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/tree/master/srcpkgs/libbitcoin-secp256k1) as dependency might be possible, but: it is based on this release: https://github.com/libbitcoin/secp256k1/releases/tag/v0.1.0.13 with the last commit included dating to December 2016. Electrum currently [uses](https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/contrib/make_libsecp256k1.sh) a commit from from June 2020 from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1.~ --> The old version of `libbitcoin-secp256k1` in Void's repos is is sufficient for now, as per [this Electrum issue](https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/7014): > if the tests pass, it is considered good enough. [to use the old libbitcoin-secp256k1] So this is ready now. Also tested locally. A patch file from https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/28305.patch is attached