New review comment by ahesford on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29326#discussion_r592902844

Comment:
It looks like the latest tag on `docker/engine` is `v19.03.13`, while the upstream `moby/moby` has many later tags. I don't think switching the upstream makes sense.

Standard Void policy is to use the repo name for the package name, so `moby` is appropriate here. I suppose `docker-cli` is a really special case because `cli` is such a generic noun that it is really devoid of meaning, but `moby` is a proper noun here and identifies the project. Searching for `docker` with `xbps-query` will still turn up `moby` because "Docker" is included in the description.

If there is a compelling reason to use the `docker/engine` upstream or other members disagree about the naming, we can debate the policy.