New comment by ScrelliCopter on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29285#issuecomment-808922315

Comment:
Author of the first PR here, just saw this.

In my experience Void usually puts precedence on the first PR in the case of duplicates. I'm not precious about who gets to be maintainer but if you'd like to make sure any improvements over my template (touché on using create_wrksrc) make it in I'd be happy to take reviews on my PR.

It seems you already figured out the reasons behind everything I was doing but I'll elaborate on why I chose `GPL-2.0-or-later`:
Sarah never appeared to have included a copy of the GPL or attached any GPL text to her own code, grepping thru showed a lot of "version 2 (or at your option) any later version"; and actually I just looked thru v17 again and `src/f82c710_upc.c` and `src/sound_azt2316a.c` are version **3** or later, so it seems like the license field should actually be `GPL-3.0-or-later` 🤷.