Re: Update to Gnome-40

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[ericonr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 194 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812864586

Comment:
Might want to compare to #29959 and paper's branch ;)

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[thegarlynch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 279 bytes --]

New comment by thegarlynch on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817539031

Comment:
Holyshit, it's great. Did they improved the performance or something ? it runs smoother compared to previous version of gnome i've run

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 249 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817501424

Comment:
There are several changes in the frontend, but from a packaging perspective it's very much like a Gnome 3.40.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 721 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817488172

Comment:
Void Linux is a rolling release distro meaning that there is only one version of Void Linux and that is constantly being updated with the latest versions of packages (with patches and bugfixes if necessary).

Gnome 40 is a new version of the GNOME desktop environment but isn't a separate DE. (it is meant to replace Gnome 3.38) The packaging in Void will reflect that.

There is a versioning scheme that exists with other "stable" distros (which just means that the packages stay the same for that release of the distro and only get patched with bugfixes and security fixes).

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 721 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817488172

Comment:
Gnome 40 is a new version of the GNOME desktop environment but isn't a separate DE. (it is meant to replace Gnome 3.38) The packaging in Void will reflect that.

Void Linux is a rolling release distro meaning that there is only one version of Void Linux and that is constantly being updated with the latest versions of packages (with patches and bugfixes if necessary).

There is a versioning scheme that exists with other "stable" distros (which just means that the packages stay the same for that release of the distro and only get patched with bugfixes and security fixes).

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 823 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817488172

Comment:
GNOME is a desktop environment and Windows is an operating system, so this isn't a great comparison.
Void Linux is a rolling release distro meaning that there is only one version of Void Linux and that is constantly being updated with the latest versions of packages (with patches and bugfixes if necessary).

Gnome 40 is a new version of the GNOME desktop environment but isn't a separate DE. (it is meant to replace Gnome 3.38) The packaging in Void will reflect that.

There is a versioning scheme that exists with other "stable" distros (which just means that the packages stay the same for that release of the distro and only get patched with bugfixes and security fixes).

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817488172

Comment:
GNOME is a desktop environment and Windows is an operating system, so this isn't a great comparison.
Void Linux is a rolling release distro meaning that there is only one version of Void Linux and that is constantly being updated with the latest versions of packages (with patches and bugfixes if necessary).

Gnome 40 is a new version of the GNOME desktop environment but isn't a separate DE. (it is meant to replace Gnome 3.38)

There is a versioning scheme that exists with other "stable" distros (which just means that the packages stay the same for that release of the distro and only get patched with bugfixes and security fixes).

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 778 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817488172

Comment:
GNOME is a desktop environment and Windows is an operating system, so this isn't a great comparison.
Void Linux is a rolling release distro meaning that there is only one version of Void Linux and that is constantly being updated with the latest versions of packages (with patches and bugfixes if necessary).

Gnome 40 is a new version of the GNOME desktop environment and is not a new DE. (it is meant to replace Gnome 3.38)

There is a versioning scheme that exists with other "stable" distros (which just means that the packages stay the same for that release of the distro and only get patched with bugfixes and security fixes).

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[thegarlynch]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]

New comment by thegarlynch on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-817485453

Comment:
Wait, gnome 40 is not different package ? i thought it is different in windows 8 and windows 10 kind of way

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 521 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-816035794

Comment:
> ```
> => mutter-40.0_1: fetching distfile 'mutter-40.0.tar.xz'...
> https://download.gnome.org/sources/mutter/40.0/mutter-40.0.tar.xz: Not Found
> ```
> 
> Doesn't seem to be due to load limiting, I can't access it locally either.

It was a real issue. Fixed.

> There are some packages with up to 3 commits, might be nice to squash them together...

commits squashed.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-816035794

Comment:
> ```
> => mutter-40.0_1: fetching distfile 'mutter-40.0.tar.xz'...
> https://download.gnome.org/sources/mutter/40.0/mutter-40.0.tar.xz: Not Found
> ```
> 
> Doesn't seem to be due to load limiting, I can't access it locally either.
It was a real issue. Fixed.

> There are some packages with up to 3 commits, might be nice to squash them together...
commits squashed.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[ericonr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 456 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-816009938

Comment:
```
=> mutter-40.0_1: fetching distfile 'mutter-40.0.tar.xz'...
https://download.gnome.org/sources/mutter/40.0/mutter-40.0.tar.xz: Not Found
```

Doesn't seem to be due to load limiting, I can't access it locally either.

There are some packages with up to 3 commits, might be nice to squash them together...

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-815671659

Comment:
> @Gottox can you take the change from #29025 into this as well and see if it works?

Let me remove this commit. It makes more sense to update it independant of gnome.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[FollieHiyuki]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]

New comment by FollieHiyuki on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-815670091

Comment:
@Gottox can you take the change from #29025 into this as well and see if it works?

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-815608469

Comment:
Any further blockers? I'll merge around friday evening 18:00 CET.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-815607340

Comment:
> `gnome-latex` should be rebuilt for `tepl-6`. There's an upstream commit on master https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-latex/-/commit/e1b01186f8a4e5d3fee4c9ccfbedd6d098517df9

fixed

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-815607340

Comment:
> `gnome-latex` should be rebuilt for `tepl-6`. There's an upstream commit on master https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-latex/-/commit/e1b01186f8a4e5d3fee4c9ccfbedd6d098517df9

Why not wait for a release?

> `gnome-latex` should be rebuilt for `tepl-6`. There's an upstream commit on master https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-latex/-/commit/e1b01186f8a4e5d3fee4c9ccfbedd6d098517df9

fixed

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[circhioz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 317 bytes --]

New comment by circhioz on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-815375534

Comment:
`gnome-latex` should be rebuilt for `tepl-6`. There's an upstream commit on master https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-latex/-/commit/e1b01186f8a4e5d3fee4c9ccfbedd6d098517df9

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 169 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-814699709

Comment:
@Piraty changes were applied!

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 243 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-814665733

Comment:
@fosslinux imho having gnome in qemu is not a common usecase. I only do that for testing and verifying.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-814664238

Comment:
We also need to think about rearranging the dependencies. Installing gnome itself doesn't result in a usable system as the drivers are missing. `xbps-install xorg gnome` installs those drivers, so that's the shortcut I'm using. But I think that should be done in a dedicated PR.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[fosslinux]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 215 bytes --]

New comment by fosslinux on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-814554623

Comment:
Do we care about QEMU enough to hold of merging until that bug is fixed?

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 206 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-814106887

Comment:
@void-linux/pkg-committers Feel free to review! :1st_place_medal: 

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 334 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-814104553

Comment:
Okay, the issue does not occur on real hardware. There are some input issues on my gpd pocket 2, but I guess that's some upstream bug and the way the screen is rotated on that particular device.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813919935

Comment:
Okay, what I found out so far:

* this issue seems to happen only on VMs so far (at least the issues mention that)
* there's a relation between the session crash and the crash of the gsd service.

The actual session log looks like this:

```
** (gsd-usb-protection:2366): WARNING **: 08:00:25.614: Failed to connect to the screen saver: Error calling StartServiceByName for org.gnome.ScreenSaver: Timeout was reached

(gsd-usb-protection:2366): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: 08:00:25.614: g_dbus_proxy_call_sync_internal: assertion 'G_IS_DBUS_PROXY (proxy)' failed
gnome-session-binary[1914]: WARNING: App 'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.UsbProtection.desktop' respawning too quickly
gnome-session-binary[1914]: WARNING: Application 'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.UsbProtection.desktop' killed by signal 11

(process:2476): Gtk-WARNING **: 08:00:25.669: Locale not supported by C library.
	Using the fallback 'C' locale.
Window manager warning: Failed to create DRM buffer wrapper: drmModeAddFB does not support format 'AR24' (0x34325241)
Window manager warning: Failed to create DRM buffer wrapper: drmModeAddFB does not support format 'AR24' (0x34325241)

(gnome-shell:1976): mutter-CRITICAL **: 08:00:26.173: meta_window_set_stack_position_no_sync: assertion 'window->stack_position >= 0' failed
```

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813903196

Comment:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/585

That looks like my exact issue.

The issue is tracked for fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937073

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 240 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813903196

Comment:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/585

That looks like my exact issue.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 672 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813897836

Comment:
> Btw, please include https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/2010 as a backport.
applied
> And I would bump `common/shlibs` for all the GNOME packages as well (there's a high chance they will be using newly available functions from other GNOME pieces).
Good idea

The glib fix has no effect on the stability issues in qemu.

But I see a second issue in dmesg:
```
[  128.022735] gsd-usb-protect[1585]: segfault at 8 ip 000055b7a42fd118 sp 00007fffa0c72190 error 4 in gsd-usb-protection[55b7a42fb000+3000]
```

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 301 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813884966

Comment:
> Have you tried on real hardware? I can give it a test drive.

Not yet. I at least want to have _some_ stability on qemu. Atm it's pretty much unusable on it.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[ericonr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 398 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813719411

Comment:
Btw, please include https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/2010 as a backport.

And I would bump `common/shlibs` for all the GNOME packages as well (there's a high chance they will be using newly available functions from other GNOME pieces).

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[ericonr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 305 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813719411

Comment:
Btw, please include https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/2010 as a backport.

And I would bump `common/shlibs` for all the GNOME packages as well.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[ericonr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 233 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813719411

Comment:
Btw, please include https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/2010 as a backport.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[ericonr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

New comment by ericonr on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813714189

Comment:
Have you tried on real hardware? I can give it a test drive.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 511 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813679785

Comment:
<h1 align="center">
:smile: 
</h1>

![Screenshot from 2021-04-05 21-56-31](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1056976/113633026-7f38df00-966c-11eb-9762-5e5554a1718f.png)
<h1 align="center">
:disappointed: 
</h1>

![Screenshot from 2021-04-05 23-57-59](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1056976/113633049-8cee6480-966c-11eb-8356-cee1200718f5.png)

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 455 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813679785

Comment:
# :smile: 
![Screenshot from 2021-04-05 21-56-31](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1056976/113633026-7f38df00-966c-11eb-9762-5e5554a1718f.png)
# :disappointed: 
![Screenshot from 2021-04-05 23-57-59](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1056976/113633049-8cee6480-966c-11eb-8356-cee1200718f5.png)

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 162 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812864610

Comment:
~duplicate of #29959.~

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7480 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813323091

Comment:
gobject-introspection-1.68.0_1 build error on armv7hf:
```
[69/99] Generating gir-glib with a custom command
FAILED: gir/GLib-2.0.gir 
/builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/tools/g-ir-scanner --output=gir/GLib-2.0.gir --no-libtool --quiet --reparse-validate --add-include-path /builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/gir --add-include-path /builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/gir --use-binary-wrapper=/usr/bin/g-ir-scanner-qemuwrapper --use-ldd-wrapper=/usr/bin/g-ir-scanner-lddwrapper --identifier-prefix=G --symbol-prefix=g --symbol-prefix=glib --c-include=glib.h --namespace=GLib --nsversion=2.0 --library=glib-2.0 --library=gobject-2.0 --external-library --pkg=glib-2.0 --cflags-begin -I/usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/lib32/glib-2.0/include -DGLIB_COMPILATION -D__G_I18N_LIB_H__ -DGETTEXT_PACKAGE=Dummy --cflags-end /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/glib-types.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/lib32/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib-unix.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/galloca.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/garray.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gasyncqueue.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gatomic.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbacktrace.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbase64.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbitlock.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbookmarkfile.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gbytes.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcharset.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gchecksum.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gconvert.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdataset.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdate.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdatetime.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gdir.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/genviron.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gerror.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gfileutils.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/ggettext.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghash.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghmac.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghook.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/ghostutils.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gi18n-lib.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gi18n.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/giochannel.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gkeyfile.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/glist.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmain.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmappedfile.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmarkup.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmem.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmessages.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gnode.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/goption.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gpattern.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gpoll.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gprimes.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gprintf.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gqsort.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gquark.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gqueue.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/grand.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/grcbox.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/grefcount.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/grefstring.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gregex.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gscanner.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gsequence.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gshell.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gslice.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gslist.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gspawn.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstdio.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstrfuncs.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstring.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstringchunk.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gstrvbuilder.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthread.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gthreadpool.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtimer.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtimezone.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtrashstack.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtree.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gunicode.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/guri.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gutils.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/guuid.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gvariant.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gvarianttype.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gversion.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gversionmacros.h /usr/armv7l-linux-gnueabihf/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gwin32.h ../gir/glib-2.0.c
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/tools/g-ir-scanner", line 98, in <module>
    from giscanner.scannermain import scanner_main
  File "/builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/giscanner/scannermain.py", line 35, in <module>
    from giscanner.ast import Include, Namespace
  File "/builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/giscanner/ast.py", line 29, in <module>
    from .sourcescanner import CTYPE_TYPEDEF, CSYMBOL_TYPE_TYPEDEF
  File "/builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/giscanner/sourcescanner.py", line 34, in <module>
    from giscanner._giscanner import SourceScanner as CSourceScanner
ImportError: Error loading shared library /builddir/gobject-introspection-1.68.0/build/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: Exec format error
[70/99] Linking target girepository/cmph/cmph-bdz-test
[71/99] Linking target girepository/gthash-test
[72/99] Linking target girepository/libgirepository-1.0.so.1.0.0
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
=> ERROR: gobject-introspection-1.68.0_1: do_build: '${make_cmd} -C ${meson_builddir} ${makejobs} ${make_build_args} ${make_build_target}' exited with 1
=> ERROR:   in do_build() at common/build-style/meson.sh:132
```

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813002361

Comment:
~Blocked by: #29689~

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 158 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-813002361

Comment:
Blocked by: #29689

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 191 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812909921

Comment:
@q66 waiting till you update webkitgtk and patches.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 223 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812890528

Comment:
@Oreo639 I'll rebase on you're PR once I've got the initial webkit2gtk update done.

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812888809

Comment:
I haven't tested this, but, assuming this works I have no issues with this superseding my pr. (less work for me, and my pr was simply meant to be just enough to be functional)

However I still have a few comments/questions:
You probably want to double check the mutter commit(s) as it seems a little messed up. (also double check the changes in the second mutter commit)

Doesn't gnome-shell still depend on gtk+3 as well?
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/master/meson.build#L84
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell/blob/rawhide/f/gnome-shell.spec#_55

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 787 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812888809

Comment:
I haven't tested this, but, assuming this works I have no issues with this superseding my pr. (less work for me, and my pr was simply meant to be just enough to be functional)
Although you might want to pull in some updates from my pr as well.

However I still have a few comments/questions:
You probably want to double check the mutter commit(s) as it seems a little messed up. (also double check the changes in the second mutter commit)

Doesn't gnome-shell still depend on gtk+3 as well?
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/master/meson.build#L84
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell/blob/rawhide/f/gnome-shell.spec#_55

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812888809

Comment:
I haven't tested this, but, assuming this works I have no issues with this superseding my pr. (less work for me, and my pr was simply meant to be just enough to be functional)

However I still have a few comments/questions:
You probably want to double check the mutter commit(s) as it seems a little messed up. (also double check the changes in the second mutter commit)

Doesn't gnome-shell still depend on gtk+3 as well?
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/master/meson.build#L84
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell/blob/rawhide/f/gnome-shell.spec#_55

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812888809

Comment:
I haven't tested this, but, assuming this works I have no issues with this superseding my pr. (less work for me, and my pr was simply meant to be just enough to be functional)

However I still have a few comments/questions:
You probably want to double check the mutter commit(s) as it seems a little messed up. (also double check the changes in the second mutter commit)

Doesn't gnome-shell still depend on gtk+3 as well?
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/master/meson.build#L84
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell/blob/rawhide/f/gnome-shell.spec#_20

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 799 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812888809

Comment:
I haven't tested this, but, assuming this works I have no issues with this superseding my pr. (less work for me, and my pr was simply meant to be just enough to be functional)

However I still have a few comments/questions:
You probably want to double check the mutter commit(s) as it seems a little messed up. (also double check the changes in the second mutter commit)

Doesn't gnome-shell still depend on gtk+3 as well or am I mistaken? (I didn't feel like testing since it would have taken too long)
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/master/meson.build#L84
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell/blob/rawhide/f/gnome-shell.spec#_20

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Oreo639]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 715 bytes --]

New comment by Oreo639 on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812888809

Comment:
I haven't tested this, but, assuming this works I have no issues with this superseding my pr. (less work for me, and my pr was simply meant to be just enough to be functional)

However I still have a few comments/questions:
You probably want to double check the mutter commit(s) as it seems a little messed up. (also double check the changes in the second mutter commit)

Doesn't gnome-shell still depend on gtk+3 as well or am I mistaken? (I didn't feel like testing since it would have taken too long)
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/master/meson.build#L84

Re: Update to Gnome-40

[Gottox]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

New comment by Gottox on void-packages repository

https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/pull/29974#issuecomment-812864610

Comment:
duplicate of #29959.